CAJ | 학술논문

哈贝马斯在其公共领域理论中虽然也看到权力和金钱对自由交流的影响，但他认为这只是资本的介入和传媒自身组织化程度的提高的结果，其负面影响可以被公共领域在很大程度上过滤掉。而在鲍德里亚看来，现代公共领域的症结在于，大众媒体为了“公共性”生产“公共性”，这导致公共话语丧失了真实的语用学功能，变成了真假难辨的仿真的公共性。
합패마사재기공공영역이론중수연야간도권력화금전대자유교류적영향，단타인위저지시자본적개입화전매자신조직화정도적제고적결과，기부면영향가이피공공영역재흔대정도상과려도。이재포덕리아간래，현대공공영역적증결재우，대음매체위료“공공성”생산“공공성”，저도치공공화어상실료진실적어용학공능，변성료진가난변적방진적공공성。
Although Habermas finds the influence of power and money on free communication in his theory public sphere, he only admits that this is the result of the promotion of the intervention of capital and the degree of the organization of the media, whose negative effect can be filtered in the public sphere to a great extent. But to Baudrillard, the problem of modern public sphere is that mass media produces“publicity”for the sake of“publicity”, which leads public speech to lose its real pragmatic function and becomes a simulated publicity hard to be differentiated.