CAJ | 학술논문

亨普尔基于逻辑公理，指出“确证原则”违反了公理 A 和两个推论 A1和 A2。类似地，“证伪原则”也违反了上述公理。亨普尔认为“确证原则”过于狭窄，而“证伪原则”又太过于宽泛。他提出了一种整体的解释理论系统的观点，同时对意义解释系统的特点提出了四点要求。亨普尔的观点为蒯因彻底批判逻辑经验主义提供了重要的理论来源和启示。
형보이기우라집공리，지출“학증원칙”위반료공리 A 화량개추론 A1화 A2。유사지，“증위원칙”야위반료상술공리。형보이인위“학증원칙”과우협착，이“증위원칙”우태과우관범。타제출료일충정체적해석이론계통적관점，동시대의의해석계통적특점제출료사점요구。형보이적관점위괴인철저비판라집경험주의제공료중요적이론래원화계시。
The present paper mainly explicates Hempe’s critiques on the principle of “affirmation”and “falsification”toward the standard of the cognitive significance of the proposition.Based on the lo-gistic postulates,Hempe pointed out that the"affirmation"principle violates A theorem and its two in-ferences:A1 and A2.Seemingly,the "falsification" principle disobeys the above theorems too.In Hempe’s view,it is too narrow to the “affirmation”principle and too wide to the “falsification”princi-ple.In the end,Hempe made out an opinion of the “holistic explanation system”,and he gave four re-quirements on the system.In conclusion,Hempe’s idea is a theoretical origin and inspiration to the fol-lowing critiques on the Logical Empiricism,especially Quine’s “Two Dogmas of the Empiricism”.