中华医学科研管理杂志
中華醫學科研管理雜誌
중화의학과연관리잡지
ZHONGHUA YIXUE KEYAN GUANLI ZAZHI CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH MANAGEMENT
2015年
4期
284-287
,共4页
安嘉璐%贾晓峰%田玲%周艳玲
安嘉璐%賈曉峰%田玲%週豔玲
안가로%가효봉%전령%주염령
科研声誉度%科研实力%医学研究机构
科研聲譽度%科研實力%醫學研究機構
과연성예도%과연실력%의학연구궤구
Scientific reputation%Scientific strength%Medical research institutions
目的 分析医学研究机构科研声誉度的影响因素及其重要性.方法 采用头脑风暴和专家咨询法确定可能影响医学研究机构科研声誉度的6个因素.通过方便抽样选取医学研究人员与医学研究生各70人作为调查对象,通过面对面访谈和邮件开展调查.采用卡方检验检验6个影响因素的提名率差异,并采用Bonferroni法卡方分割进行影响因素两两比较.结果 卡方检验显示6个影响因素的提名率具有显著差异(P＜0.001).两两比较显示“学术交流获得的信息”(70.49％)与“科研实践形成的认识”(67.21％)对医学研究机构科研声誉度的影响较大,其次是“各类排行榜”(44.26％)与“名人效应”(42.62％).结论 医学研究机构科研声誉度的主要影响因素是“学术交流获得的信息”与“科研实践形成的认识”.
目的 分析醫學研究機構科研聲譽度的影響因素及其重要性.方法 採用頭腦風暴和專傢咨詢法確定可能影響醫學研究機構科研聲譽度的6箇因素.通過方便抽樣選取醫學研究人員與醫學研究生各70人作為調查對象,通過麵對麵訪談和郵件開展調查.採用卡方檢驗檢驗6箇影響因素的提名率差異,併採用Bonferroni法卡方分割進行影響因素兩兩比較.結果 卡方檢驗顯示6箇影響因素的提名率具有顯著差異(P＜0.001).兩兩比較顯示“學術交流穫得的信息”(70.49％)與“科研實踐形成的認識”(67.21％)對醫學研究機構科研聲譽度的影響較大,其次是“各類排行榜”(44.26％)與“名人效應”(42.62％).結論 醫學研究機構科研聲譽度的主要影響因素是“學術交流穫得的信息”與“科研實踐形成的認識”.
목적 분석의학연구궤구과연성예도적영향인소급기중요성.방법 채용두뇌풍폭화전가자순법학정가능영향의학연구궤구과연성예도적6개인소.통과방편추양선취의학연구인원여의학연구생각70인작위조사대상,통과면대면방담화유건개전조사.채용잡방검험검험6개영향인소적제명솔차이,병채용Bonferroni법잡방분할진행영향인소량량비교.결과 잡방검험현시6개영향인소적제명솔구유현저차이(P＜0.001).량량비교현시“학술교류획득적신식”(70.49％)여“과연실천형성적인식”(67.21％)대의학연구궤구과연성예도적영향교대,기차시“각류배행방”(44.26％)여“명인효응”(42.62％).결론 의학연구궤구과연성예도적주요영향인소시“학술교류획득적신식”여“과연실천형성적인식”.
Objective To analyze the impact factors and their importance on academic reputation of medical research institutions in China.Methods Seventy medical researchers and 70 medical graduate students were selected by convenience sampling method.Brainstorming and expert consultation were applied to determine the 6 factors affecting the academic reputation of medical research institutions in China.A Face-to-face or e-mail interview was conducted using a designed questionnaire.Six affecting factors were nominated analyzed.Chi-square test was used to cross exam nominated rate and affecting factors;Bonferroni method was also applied to make paired comparisons.Results There is significant difference in nomination rates among 6 impact factors (P ＜ 0.001).Pairwise comparison showed that "information obtained by academic exchange" (70.49 ％) and the "scientific understanding generated from research practice" (67.21％) are top 2 impact factors to the medical research institutions;followed by "all kinds of ranking list" (44.26％),and the "celebrity effect" (42.62％).Conclusions Scientific communication and research practice are two most important factors affecting the academic reputation of medical research institutions in China.
