CAJ | 학술논문

在深化教育体制改革的探索中，许多高校开始了教授分级的改革尝试，并在实践中取得了一些成效。但是，“教授分级”作为大学教育改革中极其重要的一个问题，学术界却没有能够给予足够的理论阐释，更没有形成争鸣探讨的良性局面，以求在争鸣中逐渐形成共识，在理论上完成“顶层设计”，并由此使得这样的顶层设计不再是边摸索、边总结、边改正，而是真正地发挥理论的先导作用。遗憾的是，在许多高校推进的教授分级改革中，却没有在更高程度上形成合理的“分级理论和分级手段”。这样一来，在打破了既有的大学内部体制化模式相对均衡的同时，没有顺势建立起更富有科学精神、更富有成效的新的管理模式，致使一些大学在教授分级之后并没有达到预期的目标。因此，对大学“教授分级”这一问题进行更加深入的思考，回答改革中出现的一些新问题，便显得尤为迫切和重要。
재심화교육체제개혁적탐색중，허다고교개시료교수분급적개혁상시，병재실천중취득료일사성효。단시，“교수분급”작위대학교육개혁중겁기중요적일개문제，학술계각몰유능구급여족구적이론천석，경몰유형성쟁명탐토적량성국면，이구재쟁명중축점형성공식，재이론상완성“정층설계”，병유차사득저양적정층설계불재시변모색、변총결、변개정，이시진정지발휘이론적선도작용。유감적시，재허다고교추진적교수분급개혁중，각몰유재경고정도상형성합리적“분급이론화분급수단”。저양일래，재타파료기유적대학내부체제화모식상대균형적동시，몰유순세건립기경부유과학정신、경부유성효적신적관리모식，치사일사대학재교수분급지후병몰유체도예기적목표。인차，대대학“교수분급”저일문제진행경가심입적사고，회답개혁중출현적일사신문제，편현득우위박절화중요。
To explore how to deepen the reform of the education system ,the reform of “Professor grading” began to be experienced in many universities ,and some results have been achieved in reality. However,“professor grading”,a very important problem in the reform of college education,has not been given enough theoretical explanation in academic world. What’s worse,a good situation in which schol-ars express their different ideas has not formed in order to gradually reach consensus and gather power during the exploration. Thus,in theory,the “top level design” can be completed so that such design can end the situation of exploring,summarizing,and correcting during the work while it can really play a leading role in theory. Unfortunately,to promote the professor grading reform in many universities,a reasonable theory of “grading theory and methods”at a higher level has not emerged. As a result ,while the existing relative balance of the university systemic model at the same time has been broken ,a more scientific spirit,and more productive,new management system is not established so that after the profes-sor grading is adopted in some universities ,some universities carrying out fundamental reforms have not achieved the desired objectives because of the lack of a new identity reference. Therefore ,it is very urgent to think about the problem of “professor grading” and answer some new problems in the reform.