CAJ | 학술논문

运用文献资料法、比较法等方法，从跆拳道的技术体系、战术体系、裁判员执法三个方面对传统护具与电子护具进行比较研究。结果表明：技术体系中，传统护具比赛时基础腿法是主流。电子护具比赛时腿法呈多元化发展；战术体系中，传统护具以防守反击为主，主动进攻为辅。电子护具以攻防反一体化为发展趋势；裁判员方面，传统护具比赛时裁判员执法存在瑕疵。电子护具比赛时裁判员执法以科技引导比赛。
운용문헌자료법、비교법등방법，종태권도적기술체계、전술체계、재판원집법삼개방면대전통호구여전자호구진행비교연구。결과표명：기술체계중，전통호구비새시기출퇴법시주류。전자호구비새시퇴법정다원화발전；전술체계중，전통호구이방수반격위주，주동진공위보。전자호구이공방반일체화위발전추세；재판원방면，전통호구비새시재판원집법존재하자。전자호구비새시재판원집법이과기인도비새。
By analyzing documentary and comparison,from the tactical system,technical system and referee's judgment, this article compares traditional protective gear and Electronic Protective Gear of Tae Kwon Do. The results show:In the technical system,with traditional protective gear in a match,the basic leg techniques are most important. With electronic protective gear in a match, the leg techniques need to be diversified. In the tactical system,the traditional gear is given priority to with defensive counter-attack,and active attack is complementary. The trend of electronic protective gear is defense against integration. The aspects of referee,with traditional protective gear in a match,referee's judgment have flaws. With electronic protective gear in a match,referee's judgment guides match with science and technology.