CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨应用脑室镜治疗脑室出血与单纯脑室穿刺外引流术的疗效比较情况。方法分析我院2012年12月~2014年12月收治的60例脑室出血患者的临床资料，依据治疗措施不同进行分组，对照组30例和实验组30例。结果实验组脑室出血患者意识转清、血肿基本清除率和平均引流时间明显优于对照组，实验组脑室出血患者临床治疗总有效率明显高于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论应用脑室镜治疗脑室出血血肿清除率高，临床疗效明显，预后恢复较好，值得临床推广应用。
목적：탐토응용뇌실경치료뇌실출혈여단순뇌실천자외인류술적료효비교정황。방법분석아원2012년12월~2014년12월수치적60례뇌실출혈환자적림상자료，의거치료조시불동진행분조，대조조30례화실험조30례。결과실험조뇌실출혈환자의식전청、혈종기본청제솔화평균인류시간명현우우대조조，실험조뇌실출혈환자림상치료총유효솔명현고우대조조，차이균유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。결론응용뇌실경치료뇌실출혈혈종청제솔고，림상료효명현，예후회복교호，치득림상추엄응용。
Objective To explore the comparison of the curative effect of ventricularendoscope and simple ventricle puncture external drainage in treatment of intraventricular hemorrhage.MethodsData of 60 patients with intraventricular hemorrhage who admitted to our hospital from December 2012 to December 2014 were analyzed and they were admitted to the control group and the experimental group according to different treatment methods, with 30 in each.Results Recovering consciousness, rate of removed hematoma and average drainage time of patients with intraventricular hemorrhage in the experimental group were superior to those of the control group and the total clinical effective rate of them in the experimental group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The difference was statistical significant.Conclusion Ventricularendoscope in the treatment of intraventricular hemorrhage has a higher rate of removed hematoma, a significant clinical curative effect and a better prognosis recovery, worthy of clinical promotion and application.