CAJ | 학술논문

目的：???研究在5~6岁儿童中改良巴斯法、竖刷法、圆弧法龈上菌斑清除率的差异，并比较儿童对几种刷牙方法掌握程度的差异。方法???将3个幼儿园大班随机分为改良巴斯法、竖刷法、圆弧法组，分别进行刷牙方法宣教。宣教结束后第二天、第八天分2次测定菌斑清除率，宣教后第八天对受试者刷牙方法打分。结果???第一次检测改良巴斯法组、竖刷法组、圆弧法组菌斑清除率分别为81%、75%、82%，3组差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；第二次检测分别为88%、68%、80%，改良巴斯法组与圆弧法组优于竖刷法组（P<0.05）；3种刷牙方法表现得分差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论??改良巴斯刷牙法与圆弧法可作为向5~6岁儿童推荐的刷牙方法。
목적：???연구재5~6세인동중개량파사법、수쇄법、원호법간상균반청제솔적차이，병비교인동대궤충쇄아방법장악정도적차이。방법???장3개유인완대반수궤분위개량파사법、수쇄법、원호법조，분별진행쇄아방법선교。선교결속후제이천、제팔천분2차측정균반청제솔，선교후제팔천대수시자쇄아방법타분。결과???제일차검측개량파사법조、수쇄법조、원호법조균반청제솔분별위81%、75%、82%，3조차이무통계학의의（P>0.05）；제이차검측분별위88%、68%、80%，개량파사법조여원호법조우우수쇄법조（P<0.05）；3충쇄아방법표현득분차이무통계학의의（P>0.05）。결론??개량파사쇄아법여원호법가작위향5~6세인동추천적쇄아방법。
Objective??The?study?aimed?to?explore?supragingival?plaque?removal?efficacy?of?modified?Bass,?vertical?and?Fones?toothbrushing?method?among?5?to?6?year-old?children,?and?to?compare?the?learn?ability?of?the?three?methods.?Methods?Three?top?classes?in?separate?kindergartens?were?randomly?assigned?to?modified?Bass,?vertical?and?Fones?group.?Propaganda?of?corresponding?toothbrushing?method?was?accomplished?within?two?days?for?each?group.?Then?plaque?removal?efficacy?was?examined?the?second?and?eighth?day?after?propaganda.?Individual?toothbrushing?performance?was?graded?the?eighth?day?after?propaganda.?Results??During?the?first?examination,?plaque?removal?rate?of?modified?Bass,?vertical?and?Fones?group?was?81%,?75%,?82%?respectively,?demonstrating?no?statistical?significance(P>0.05).?During?the?second?examination,?removal?rate?was?88%,?68%,?80%?respectively.?According?to?statistical?analysis,?modified?Bass?and?Fones?group?showed?better?plaque?removal?efficacy?than?vertical?group(P<0.05),?while?no?statistical?significance?was?found?between?modified?Bass?and?Fones?group(P>0.05).?Performance?score?of?the?three?groups?showed?no?statistical?significance(P>0.05).?Conclusion???Our?results?implied?modified?Bass?and?Fones?method?could?be?recommended?to?5?to?6?year-old?children.