医药导报
醫藥導報
의약도보
HERALD OF MEDICINE
2015年
9期
1203-1206
,共4页
李光%路娟%李学兰%张宁%刘斌%陈曦
李光%路娟%李學蘭%張寧%劉斌%陳晞
리광%로연%리학란%장저%류빈%진희
肾茶%色谱法,高效液相%橙黄酮%半齿泽兰素%半齿泽兰素-5-甲醚
腎茶%色譜法,高效液相%橙黃酮%半齒澤蘭素%半齒澤蘭素-5-甲醚
신다%색보법,고효액상%등황동%반치택란소%반치택란소-5-갑미
Orthosiphon stamineus%Chromatography,high performance liquid%Sinensetin%Eupatorin%3′-hydroxy-5,6,7,4′-tetramethoxyflavone
目的:建立测定肾茶提取物中橙黄酮、半齿泽兰素、半齿泽兰素-5-甲醚含量的方法。方法采用高效液相色谱(HPLC)法,Symmetry C18(4.6 mm×150 mm,5μm)色谱柱,流动相为乙腈-0.05%磷酸缓冲液,梯度洗脱;流速:1 mL?min-1,柱温:30℃,检测波长:365 nm,进样量为10μL。结果橙黄酮在0.50~5.00μg、半齿泽兰素在0.50~5.00μg、半齿泽兰素-5-甲醚在0.05~0.50μg 范围内具有良好的线性关系;平均加样回收率分别为101.26%,100.28%和99.66%。 RSD 分别为1.73%,0.82%和1.67%。结论该方法简便、准确,可用于肾茶的质量评价。
目的:建立測定腎茶提取物中橙黃酮、半齒澤蘭素、半齒澤蘭素-5-甲醚含量的方法。方法採用高效液相色譜(HPLC)法,Symmetry C18(4.6 mm×150 mm,5μm)色譜柱,流動相為乙腈-0.05%燐痠緩遲液,梯度洗脫;流速:1 mL?min-1,柱溫:30℃,檢測波長:365 nm,進樣量為10μL。結果橙黃酮在0.50~5.00μg、半齒澤蘭素在0.50~5.00μg、半齒澤蘭素-5-甲醚在0.05~0.50μg 範圍內具有良好的線性關繫;平均加樣迴收率分彆為101.26%,100.28%和99.66%。 RSD 分彆為1.73%,0.82%和1.67%。結論該方法簡便、準確,可用于腎茶的質量評價。
목적:건립측정신다제취물중등황동、반치택란소、반치택란소-5-갑미함량적방법。방법채용고효액상색보(HPLC)법,Symmetry C18(4.6 mm×150 mm,5μm)색보주,류동상위을정-0.05%린산완충액,제도세탈;류속:1 mL?min-1,주온:30℃,검측파장:365 nm,진양량위10μL。결과등황동재0.50~5.00μg、반치택란소재0.50~5.00μg、반치택란소-5-갑미재0.05~0.50μg 범위내구유량호적선성관계;평균가양회수솔분별위101.26%,100.28%화99.66%。 RSD 분별위1.73%,0.82%화1.67%。결론해방법간편、준학,가용우신다적질량평개。
Objective To develop a method for content determination of sinensetin,eupatorin,and 3′-hydroxy-5,6,7, 4′-tetramethoxyflavone in Orthosiphon stamineus. Methods The determination was carried out on a Symmetry C18 column (4.6 mm×250 mm,5 μm) by HPLC.The mobile consisted of acetonitrile and water containing 0.05% H3 PO4 in gradient elution. The flow rate was 1 mL?min-1 ,the column temperature was 30 ℃ ,the detected wavelength was set at 365 nm, and the injection volume was 10 μL. Results The peak areas and the sample quantity of the three components presented good linear relationship in the range of 0. 50 - 5. 00 μg for sinensetin,0. 50 - 5. 00 μg for eupatorin, and 0. 05 - 0. 50 μg for 3′-hydroxy-5,6,7,4′-tetramethoxyflavone.The average recoveries were 101.26%,100.28% and 99.66%,respectively. RSD were 1.73%, 0.82% and 1.67%, respectively. Conclusion The method is proved to be simple,accurate and can be used for the quality evaluation of Orthosiphon stamineus.