中华劳动卫生职业病杂志
中華勞動衛生職業病雜誌
중화노동위생직업병잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AND OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES
2015年
8期
583-585
,共3页
张海宏%李勇勤%周海林%荣幸%朱少芳%何易楠%翟然%刘移民
張海宏%李勇勤%週海林%榮倖%硃少芳%何易楠%翟然%劉移民
장해굉%리용근%주해림%영행%주소방%하역남%적연%류이민
职业卫生%职业危害%现场调查%监测
職業衛生%職業危害%現場調查%鑑測
직업위생%직업위해%현장조사%감측
Occupational health%Occupational hazard%On-site investigation%Surveillance
目的 通过分析广州市生产性企业职业卫生状况,为职业卫生监管提供数据支持.方法 按行业分层随机抽取8个行业280家企业,进行职业卫生调查;依据职业卫生规范,对其中198家企业监督监测,选择劳动者接触时间最长、职业病危害因素浓度/强度最高的3~5个工作岗位进行采样检测,对不同行业的企业、岗位以及检测项目的危害因素超标率进行对比分析.结果 42.93%(85/198)的企业、22.96%(200/871)的检测岗位职业病危害因素超标;船舶修造、木质家具行业中的噪声,以及船舶修造行业中的电焊烟尘是超标最严重的危害因素;不足30%的企业能够提供职业健康检查和工作场所中职业病危害因素定期检测报告;职业健康检查必检项目异常需复查的劳动者占6.63%(832/12 549),主要集中在船舶修造、木质家具、化工等企业.结论 应加强对该企业的职业卫生监管工作,有针对性地控制或减少噪声、粉尘等因素的危害;加强企业职业卫生相关数据信息公开工作,扩大社会监督.
目的 通過分析廣州市生產性企業職業衛生狀況,為職業衛生鑑管提供數據支持.方法 按行業分層隨機抽取8箇行業280傢企業,進行職業衛生調查;依據職業衛生規範,對其中198傢企業鑑督鑑測,選擇勞動者接觸時間最長、職業病危害因素濃度/彊度最高的3~5箇工作崗位進行採樣檢測,對不同行業的企業、崗位以及檢測項目的危害因素超標率進行對比分析.結果 42.93%(85/198)的企業、22.96%(200/871)的檢測崗位職業病危害因素超標;船舶脩造、木質傢具行業中的譟聲,以及船舶脩造行業中的電銲煙塵是超標最嚴重的危害因素;不足30%的企業能夠提供職業健康檢查和工作場所中職業病危害因素定期檢測報告;職業健康檢查必檢項目異常需複查的勞動者佔6.63%(832/12 549),主要集中在船舶脩造、木質傢具、化工等企業.結論 應加彊對該企業的職業衛生鑑管工作,有針對性地控製或減少譟聲、粉塵等因素的危害;加彊企業職業衛生相關數據信息公開工作,擴大社會鑑督.
목적 통과분석엄주시생산성기업직업위생상황,위직업위생감관제공수거지지.방법 안행업분층수궤추취8개행업280가기업,진행직업위생조사;의거직업위생규범,대기중198가기업감독감측,선택노동자접촉시간최장、직업병위해인소농도/강도최고적3~5개공작강위진행채양검측,대불동행업적기업、강위이급검측항목적위해인소초표솔진행대비분석.결과 42.93%(85/198)적기업、22.96%(200/871)적검측강위직업병위해인소초표;선박수조、목질가구행업중적조성,이급선박수조행업중적전한연진시초표최엄중적위해인소;불족30%적기업능구제공직업건강검사화공작장소중직업병위해인소정기검측보고;직업건강검사필검항목이상수복사적노동자점6.63%(832/12 549),주요집중재선박수조、목질가구、화공등기업.결론 응가강대해기업적직업위생감관공작,유침대성지공제혹감소조성、분진등인소적위해;가강기업직업위생상관수거신식공개공작,확대사회감독.
Objective To provide data for the occupational health supervision by analyzing the occupational health status in manufacturing industry in Guangzhou,China.Methods The occupational health investigation was performed in 280 enterprises randomly selected from 8 industries based on industry stratification.According to the occupational health standards,198 out of the 280 enterprises were supervised and monitored.Sample testing was performed in 3 ~5 workplaces where workers were exposed to the highest concentration/intensity of occupational hazard for the longest time.Comparative analyses of the overproof rates of hazard were performed among enterprises,workplaces,and testing items from different industries.Results The concentrations of occupational hazard in 42.93% (85/198) of enterprises and 22.96% (200/871) of workplaces were above the limit concentration.The most severe hazards were the noises in shipbuilding and wooden furniture industries and the welding fumes in shipbuilding industry.Less than 30% of enterprises were able to provide occupational health examination and periodic test reports of occupational hazard in workplaces.The rate of the workers with abnormal occupational health examination results and the need for reexamination reached 6.63% (832/12 549),and they were mostly from shipbuilding,wooden furniture,and chemical industries.Conclusion The occupational health supervision should be strengthened in enterprises,and hazard from noises and dusts should be selectively controlled or reduced.The publication of relevant data and information of occupational health in enterprises should be promoted to enhance social supervision.