实用癌症杂志
實用癌癥雜誌
실용암증잡지
THE PRACTICAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
2015年
9期
1344-1346
,共3页
孙光源%郭飞%王晓元%张月%王一飞%薛军%屈明
孫光源%郭飛%王曉元%張月%王一飛%薛軍%屈明
손광원%곽비%왕효원%장월%왕일비%설군%굴명
近端胃癌%手术方式%重建方式
近耑胃癌%手術方式%重建方式
근단위암%수술방식%중건방식
Proximal gastric cancer%Operation mode%Reconstruction
目的:探讨近端胃癌根治术不同手术方式及重建方式对患者长短期预后的影响。方法将120例近端胃癌患者随机分为PG-EG、TG-RY、PG-JI 3组,3组患者的手术方式及重建方式不同。观察3组患者的围手术期以及近远期并发症对患者的影响。结果3组患者在手术时间、术中出血量以及淋巴结清扫个数上的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),且TG-RY组的手术时间、术中出血量以及淋巴结清扫个数上明显比其余2组多。但是3组在术后感染率、吻合口瘘发生率以及肠梗阻的发生上差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。3组相比较,远期并发症如倾倒综合征以及碱性反流性胃炎存在明显差异,具有统计学意义(P<0.05),且TG-RY组这两种并发症的发生率比其余2组高。但是3组在随访中在肿瘤的复发率上差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。3组患者在随访中发现,患者的无瘤生存率在1年(92.5%,95.0%,95.0%)、3年(57.5%,62.5%,60.0%)以及5年(19.0%,17.0%,20.0%)上没有明显差异,不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 PG-EG、TG-RY、PG-JI 3种手术及重建方式各有利弊,应根据患者的具体实际情况选择手术及重建方式以期达到最佳治疗效果。
目的:探討近耑胃癌根治術不同手術方式及重建方式對患者長短期預後的影響。方法將120例近耑胃癌患者隨機分為PG-EG、TG-RY、PG-JI 3組,3組患者的手術方式及重建方式不同。觀察3組患者的圍手術期以及近遠期併髮癥對患者的影響。結果3組患者在手術時間、術中齣血量以及淋巴結清掃箇數上的差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05),且TG-RY組的手術時間、術中齣血量以及淋巴結清掃箇數上明顯比其餘2組多。但是3組在術後感染率、吻閤口瘺髮生率以及腸梗阻的髮生上差異不具有統計學意義(P>0.05)。3組相比較,遠期併髮癥如傾倒綜閤徵以及堿性反流性胃炎存在明顯差異,具有統計學意義(P<0.05),且TG-RY組這兩種併髮癥的髮生率比其餘2組高。但是3組在隨訪中在腫瘤的複髮率上差異不具有統計學意義(P>0.05)。3組患者在隨訪中髮現,患者的無瘤生存率在1年(92.5%,95.0%,95.0%)、3年(57.5%,62.5%,60.0%)以及5年(19.0%,17.0%,20.0%)上沒有明顯差異,不具有統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論 PG-EG、TG-RY、PG-JI 3種手術及重建方式各有利弊,應根據患者的具體實際情況選擇手術及重建方式以期達到最佳治療效果。
목적:탐토근단위암근치술불동수술방식급중건방식대환자장단기예후적영향。방법장120례근단위암환자수궤분위PG-EG、TG-RY、PG-JI 3조,3조환자적수술방식급중건방식불동。관찰3조환자적위수술기이급근원기병발증대환자적영향。결과3조환자재수술시간、술중출혈량이급림파결청소개수상적차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05),차TG-RY조적수술시간、술중출혈량이급림파결청소개수상명현비기여2조다。단시3조재술후감염솔、문합구루발생솔이급장경조적발생상차이불구유통계학의의(P>0.05)。3조상비교,원기병발증여경도종합정이급감성반류성위염존재명현차이,구유통계학의의(P<0.05),차TG-RY조저량충병발증적발생솔비기여2조고。단시3조재수방중재종류적복발솔상차이불구유통계학의의(P>0.05)。3조환자재수방중발현,환자적무류생존솔재1년(92.5%,95.0%,95.0%)、3년(57.5%,62.5%,60.0%)이급5년(19.0%,17.0%,20.0%)상몰유명현차이,불구유통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론 PG-EG、TG-RY、PG-JI 3충수술급중건방식각유리폐,응근거환자적구체실제정황선택수술급중건방식이기체도최가치료효과。
Objective To study the effect of different tumor resection and reconstruction scheme in proximal gastric cancer on prognosis.Methods 120 patients diagnosed as proximal gastric cancer were randomly divided into PG-EG group,TG-RY group,and PG-JI group.The 3 groups received different operation and reconstructions methods.Effect of perioperative,short-term and long-term complications on patients were observed.Results There had statistically significant difference in the 3 groups in operative time,bleeding volume,and lymph node dissection number (P<0.05),and operative time,bleeding volume,and lymph node dissection number of TG-RY group were significantly higher than those of the other 2 groups.But the 3 groups had no statistically significant difference in infection,anastomotic leakage rate and intestinal obstruction occurrence rate (P>0.05).The long-term complications such as dumping syndrome and alkaline reflux gastritis had obvious difference in the 3 groups,( P<0.05),and dumping syndrome and alkaline reflux gastritis of TG-RY group had higher incidence than those of the other 2 groups. There had no statistically significant difference in the 3 groups in tumor recurrence rate ( P>0.05) .There had no statistically sig-nificant difference in the 3 groups (P>0.05)in 1-year tumor free survival rates (92.5%,95.0%,95.0%),3-year tumor free survival rates(57.5%,62.5%,60.0%) and 5-year tumor free survival rates(19.0%,17.0%,20.0%).Conclusion PG-EG, TG-RY,PG-JI have advantages and disadvantages,actual situation of patients should be considered in selecting specific operation and reconstruction mode,in order to achieve the best therapeutic effect.