中华内科杂志
中華內科雜誌
중화내과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
2015年
9期
773-777
,共5页
王腾科%卢家凯%陈峣%李强%叶清%高洁%孙建萍%耿丽敏%王慧
王騰科%盧傢凱%陳峣%李彊%葉清%高潔%孫建萍%耿麗敏%王慧
왕등과%로가개%진요%리강%협청%고길%손건평%경려민%왕혜
高血压,肺性%妊娠%肺动脉导管%围手术期
高血壓,肺性%妊娠%肺動脈導管%圍手術期
고혈압,폐성%임신%폐동맥도관%위수술기
Hypertension,pulmonary%Pregnancy%Pulmonary artery catheter%Perioperative period
目的 探讨肺动脉导管(PAC)在妊娠合并肺动脉高压患者围产期的应用,为PAC在此类患者中的应用提供参考.方法 回顾性分析2006-2014年首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院综合外科ICU收治的妊娠合并肺动脉高压患者的临床资料,比较留置与未留置PAC患者的临床及预后.结果 术前超声心动图测量肺动脉收缩压,留置PAC患者为(103.0±24.1) mmHg(1 mmHg =0.133kPa),未留置PAC患者为(96.4 ±27.3) mmHg,差异无统计学意义(P=0.175).超声心动图测量肺动脉压与PAC测量肺动脉压比,有高估或低估的可能,差值波动在-38.4 ~ 49.5 mmHg.与未留置PAC患者比,留置PAC患者特发性肺动脉高压比例较高(20.0%比3.2%);术中采用连续硬膜外麻醉比例高(89.1%比65.1%);去甲肾上腺素、多巴酚丁胺、西地那非、前列地尔、伊洛前列素及低分子肝素的使用较多;病死率较高(16.4%比3.2%);低体重儿(63.9%比30.6%)、极低体重儿(19.4%比13.9%)的比例较高;人工流产比例略低(5.5%比17.5%).留置PAC患者术后ICU停留时间[6.0(5.0)d比1.0(3.0)d]、术后住院时间[8.0(6.0)d比8.0(4.0)d]、总住院费用[43 999.22(38 267.27)元比14 878.24(10 564.47)元]高于未留置PAC患者.PAC相关并发症的发生率为7.3%.结论 对临床症状较重的妊娠合并中、重度肺动脉高压患者留置PAC,有利于围产期持续肺动脉压监测及指导药物治疗,以改善患者的临床结局,降低短期病死率,而超声心动图测量肺动脉压不能替代PAC在肺动脉压监测中的地位.
目的 探討肺動脈導管(PAC)在妊娠閤併肺動脈高壓患者圍產期的應用,為PAC在此類患者中的應用提供參攷.方法 迴顧性分析2006-2014年首都醫科大學附屬北京安貞醫院綜閤外科ICU收治的妊娠閤併肺動脈高壓患者的臨床資料,比較留置與未留置PAC患者的臨床及預後.結果 術前超聲心動圖測量肺動脈收縮壓,留置PAC患者為(103.0±24.1) mmHg(1 mmHg =0.133kPa),未留置PAC患者為(96.4 ±27.3) mmHg,差異無統計學意義(P=0.175).超聲心動圖測量肺動脈壓與PAC測量肺動脈壓比,有高估或低估的可能,差值波動在-38.4 ~ 49.5 mmHg.與未留置PAC患者比,留置PAC患者特髮性肺動脈高壓比例較高(20.0%比3.2%);術中採用連續硬膜外痳醉比例高(89.1%比65.1%);去甲腎上腺素、多巴酚丁胺、西地那非、前列地爾、伊洛前列素及低分子肝素的使用較多;病死率較高(16.4%比3.2%);低體重兒(63.9%比30.6%)、極低體重兒(19.4%比13.9%)的比例較高;人工流產比例略低(5.5%比17.5%).留置PAC患者術後ICU停留時間[6.0(5.0)d比1.0(3.0)d]、術後住院時間[8.0(6.0)d比8.0(4.0)d]、總住院費用[43 999.22(38 267.27)元比14 878.24(10 564.47)元]高于未留置PAC患者.PAC相關併髮癥的髮生率為7.3%.結論 對臨床癥狀較重的妊娠閤併中、重度肺動脈高壓患者留置PAC,有利于圍產期持續肺動脈壓鑑測及指導藥物治療,以改善患者的臨床結跼,降低短期病死率,而超聲心動圖測量肺動脈壓不能替代PAC在肺動脈壓鑑測中的地位.
목적 탐토폐동맥도관(PAC)재임신합병폐동맥고압환자위산기적응용,위PAC재차류환자중적응용제공삼고.방법 회고성분석2006-2014년수도의과대학부속북경안정의원종합외과ICU수치적임신합병폐동맥고압환자적림상자료,비교류치여미류치PAC환자적림상급예후.결과 술전초성심동도측량폐동맥수축압,류치PAC환자위(103.0±24.1) mmHg(1 mmHg =0.133kPa),미류치PAC환자위(96.4 ±27.3) mmHg,차이무통계학의의(P=0.175).초성심동도측량폐동맥압여PAC측량폐동맥압비,유고고혹저고적가능,차치파동재-38.4 ~ 49.5 mmHg.여미류치PAC환자비,류치PAC환자특발성폐동맥고압비례교고(20.0%비3.2%);술중채용련속경막외마취비례고(89.1%비65.1%);거갑신상선소、다파분정알、서지나비、전렬지이、이락전렬소급저분자간소적사용교다;병사솔교고(16.4%비3.2%);저체중인(63.9%비30.6%)、겁저체중인(19.4%비13.9%)적비례교고;인공유산비례략저(5.5%비17.5%).류치PAC환자술후ICU정류시간[6.0(5.0)d비1.0(3.0)d]、술후주원시간[8.0(6.0)d비8.0(4.0)d]、총주원비용[43 999.22(38 267.27)원비14 878.24(10 564.47)원]고우미류치PAC환자.PAC상관병발증적발생솔위7.3%.결론 대림상증상교중적임신합병중、중도폐동맥고압환자류치PAC,유리우위산기지속폐동맥압감측급지도약물치료,이개선환자적림상결국,강저단기병사솔,이초성심동도측량폐동맥압불능체대PAC재폐동맥압감측중적지위.
Objective To investigate the application and value of pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) in pregnant patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH).Methods The clinical data of pregnant patients with PH who were treated between 2006 and 2014 in surgical intensive care unit (SICU) at Capital Medical University affiliated Beijing Anzhen Hospital were retrospectively analysed.The differences of the clinical characteristics and outcome between PAC inserted patients and PAC not inserted patients were compared.Results The systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) measured by preoperative echocardiography has no significant difference between the PAC inserted patients [(103.0 ± 24.1) mmHg (1 mmHg =0.133 kPa)] and PAC not inserted patients [(96.4 ±27.3)mmHg;P =0.175].SPAP may be overestimated or underestimated by echocardiography compared with PAC with a gap from-38.4 mmHg to 49.5 mmHg.The rates of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (20.0% vs 3.2%) and continuous use of epidural anesthesia (89.1% vs 65.1%) were higher in PAC inserted patients compared with PAC not inserted patients.Norepinephrine,dobutamine,sildenafil,alprostadil,iloprost and low molecular weight heparin were more widely used in PAC inserted patients.The mortality rate and the rates of low birth weight (63.9% vs 30.6%) and very low birth weight infants (19.4% vs 13.9%) were all higher in PAC inserted patients,while the rate of induced abortion was lower in this group (5.5% vs 17.5%).The length of stay in surgical intensive care unit [6.0 (5.0) d vs 1.0 (3.0) d],postoperative length of stay [8.0 (6.0) d vs 8.0 (4.0) d] and total hospital costs [43 999.22 (38 267.27)RMB vs 14 878.24 (10 564.47) RMB] were all higher in PAC inserted patients.The incidence rate of PAC related complications was 7.3%.Conclusions In moderate or severe PH pregnant patients with severe clinical symptoms,perioperative insertion of PAC helps to monitor the perinatal pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) and guide treatment,potentially improving clinical outcomes and lowering the short term mortality.PAC can't be replaced by echocardiography in measuring PAP.