CAJ | 학술논문

目的：比较麦默通微创旋切术与开放手术治疗乳腺良性肿物的临床效果。方法：选取241例门诊乳腺肿块手术患者，按照手术方式的不同，将其分为观察组和对照组，观察组122例，采用麦默通微创旋切术治疗；对照组119例，采用传统切开手术治疗，并对两组患者的手术时间、出血量、切口直径、伤口愈合时间、瘢痕大小以及满意度进行比较。结果：对照组与观察组手术时间分别为(17.3±5.1)min和(6.8±2.3)min；切口直径分别为(3.1±0.22)cm和(0.29±0.43) cm；术中出血量分别为(18.5±10.2)ml和(6.3±1.9)ml；切口愈合时间分别为(7.3±0.7)d和(1.95±0.6)d；瘢痕大小分别为(1.32±0.21)cm和(0.17±0.06)cm；患者满意度分别为84.23%和99.17%，两组相比差异有统计学意义(x2=4.09，P＜0.01)。结论：麦默通微创旋切术组的各项指标优于对照组。
목적：비교맥묵통미창선절술여개방수술치료유선량성종물적림상효과。방법：선취241례문진유선종괴수술환자，안조수술방식적불동，장기분위관찰조화대조조，관찰조122례，채용맥묵통미창선절술치료；대조조119례，채용전통절개수술치료，병대량조환자적수술시간、출혈량、절구직경、상구유합시간、반흔대소이급만의도진행비교。결과：대조조여관찰조수술시간분별위(17.3±5.1)min화(6.8±2.3)min；절구직경분별위(3.1±0.22)cm화(0.29±0.43) cm；술중출혈량분별위(18.5±10.2)ml화(6.3±1.9)ml；절구유합시간분별위(7.3±0.7)d화(1.95±0.6)d；반흔대소분별위(1.32±0.21)cm화(0.17±0.06)cm；환자만의도분별위84.23%화99.17%，량조상비차이유통계학의의(x2=4.09，P＜0.01)。결론：맥묵통미창선절술조적각항지표우우대조조。
Objective:To compare Mammotome system with traditional surgery in excision of breast tumors.Methods: One hundred and twenty-two cases of Mammotome minimally invasive as observation group, 119 cases of traditional surgery as control group.Results:Observation group is better than the control group. Control group/Observation group: working time17.3±5.1/6.8±2.3min; incision size3.1±0.22/0.29±0.43cm; bleeding18.5±10.2/6.3±1.9ml; healing time7.3±0.7/1.95±0.6d; scar size1.32±0.21/0.17±0.06cm; and patient satisfaction 84.23%/99.17%,P<0.01.Conclusion: The effect of Mammotome minimally invasive not only advantages in the treatment but also beauty .