电力系统自动化
電力繫統自動化
전력계통자동화
AUTOMATION OF ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS
2015年
17期
153-159
,共7页
周全%冯冬涵%徐长宝%冯成%孙弢%丁藤
週全%馮鼕涵%徐長寶%馮成%孫弢%丁籐
주전%풍동함%서장보%풍성%손도%정등
低碳电力%碳排放责任分摊%负荷侧%合作博弈%Shapley 值
低碳電力%碳排放責任分攤%負荷側%閤作博弈%Shapley 值
저탄전력%탄배방책임분탄%부하측%합작박혁%Shapley 치
low-carbon electricity%carbon obligation allocation%demand side%cooperative game theory%Shapley value
为了电力系统碳排放责任分摊机制的有效性和透明性,可以考虑从基于电力消费的角度出发在负荷侧直接进行碳排放责任分摊。由于负荷成员在碳排放责任分摊问题上的相互联系,该分摊问题可从合作博弈的角度出发,应用经典的解的概念如 Shapley 值和广义核仁进行求解。结合该问题的实际特点,分别阐述了基于 Shapley 值、广义核仁、节点碳迹强度和节点边际碳强度的四种分摊方法的基本原理和计算方法,并总结了相关公理作为衡量标准来对比分析这四种方法。其中,基于 Shapley 值的分摊方法更能综合评估负荷的位置、负荷成员间的相互影响等相关因素的作用,从而准确地反映出各个负荷成员对于全系统碳排放的实际贡献。最后采用一个 PJM-5节点系统算例验证该分摊方法的公平性、合理性和可行性。
為瞭電力繫統碳排放責任分攤機製的有效性和透明性,可以攷慮從基于電力消費的角度齣髮在負荷側直接進行碳排放責任分攤。由于負荷成員在碳排放責任分攤問題上的相互聯繫,該分攤問題可從閤作博弈的角度齣髮,應用經典的解的概唸如 Shapley 值和廣義覈仁進行求解。結閤該問題的實際特點,分彆闡述瞭基于 Shapley 值、廣義覈仁、節點碳跡彊度和節點邊際碳彊度的四種分攤方法的基本原理和計算方法,併總結瞭相關公理作為衡量標準來對比分析這四種方法。其中,基于 Shapley 值的分攤方法更能綜閤評估負荷的位置、負荷成員間的相互影響等相關因素的作用,從而準確地反映齣各箇負荷成員對于全繫統碳排放的實際貢獻。最後採用一箇 PJM-5節點繫統算例驗證該分攤方法的公平性、閤理性和可行性。
위료전력계통탄배방책임분탄궤제적유효성화투명성,가이고필종기우전력소비적각도출발재부하측직접진행탄배방책임분탄。유우부하성원재탄배방책임분탄문제상적상호련계,해분탄문제가종합작박혁적각도출발,응용경전적해적개념여 Shapley 치화엄의핵인진행구해。결합해문제적실제특점,분별천술료기우 Shapley 치、엄의핵인、절점탄적강도화절점변제탄강도적사충분탄방법적기본원리화계산방법,병총결료상관공리작위형량표준래대비분석저사충방법。기중,기우 Shapley 치적분탄방법경능종합평고부하적위치、부하성원간적상호영향등상관인소적작용,종이준학지반영출각개부하성원대우전계통탄배방적실제공헌。최후채용일개 PJM-5절점계통산례험증해분탄방법적공평성、합이성화가행성。
For transparency and effectiveness of allocation mechanism,the carbon emission obligation of the whole system can be directly allocated at demand side from a consumption-based perspective.The problem can be treated as a cooperative game due to the interactions between the loads with respect to the system-wide carbon emission,and the classic solution concepts such as Shapley value and prenucleolus can be applied to address the problem.By combining the characteristics of the problem, four allocation methods based on the Shapley value,prenucleolus,footprint carbon intensity and marginal carbon intensity, respectively,are demonstrated.Some axioms are summarized and used as fundamental criteria to judge these allocation methods.Comparatively, the Shapley value based method can better estimate the locational factors of loads and their interactions,thereby reflecting the actual contribution of each load to the system-wide carbon emission.It has a better performance than other methods in terms of fairness,reasonableness and feasibility,as verified on a PJM-5-bus system.