哈尔滨工程大学学报
哈爾濱工程大學學報
합이빈공정대학학보
JOURNAL OF HARBIN ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY
2015年
8期
1049-1056
,共8页
等效线性化%单向速度大脉冲%双向速度大脉冲%永久位移%适用条件%场地响应
等效線性化%單嚮速度大脈遲%雙嚮速度大脈遲%永久位移%適用條件%場地響應
등효선성화%단향속도대맥충%쌍향속도대맥충%영구위이%괄용조건%장지향응
equivalent linearization%one-way large velocity pulse%two-way large velocity pulse%permanent dis-placement%applicable conditions%site response
为了探讨近场强地震动中产生较大永久位移的“单向”速度大脉冲和近似不产生永久位移的“双向”速度大脉冲是否可用等效线性化方法分析处理,选取具有典型特性的地震动作为输入,通过“方法自检验”和“前人成果定性比较”等手段,分析了近场速度脉冲场地响应采用等效线性方法进行分析的适用条件。计算结果表明:对于“弱”和“中等”强度的近场“双向”速度脉冲型地震动作用,可以采用等效线性化方法进行分析。这种做法是合理的、有效的。但是,对于近场“单向”速度大脉冲型地震动作用,不适宜采用等效线性化方法进行分析,计算结果将会产生很大误差,尤其是不能反映场地永久位移和永久塑性变形特征。
為瞭探討近場彊地震動中產生較大永久位移的“單嚮”速度大脈遲和近似不產生永久位移的“雙嚮”速度大脈遲是否可用等效線性化方法分析處理,選取具有典型特性的地震動作為輸入,通過“方法自檢驗”和“前人成果定性比較”等手段,分析瞭近場速度脈遲場地響應採用等效線性方法進行分析的適用條件。計算結果錶明:對于“弱”和“中等”彊度的近場“雙嚮”速度脈遲型地震動作用,可以採用等效線性化方法進行分析。這種做法是閤理的、有效的。但是,對于近場“單嚮”速度大脈遲型地震動作用,不適宜採用等效線性化方法進行分析,計算結果將會產生很大誤差,尤其是不能反映場地永久位移和永久塑性變形特徵。
위료탐토근장강지진동중산생교대영구위이적“단향”속도대맥충화근사불산생영구위이적“쌍향”속도대맥충시부가용등효선성화방법분석처리,선취구유전형특성적지진동작위수입,통과“방법자검험”화“전인성과정성비교”등수단,분석료근장속도맥충장지향응채용등효선성방법진행분석적괄용조건。계산결과표명:대우“약”화“중등”강도적근장“쌍향”속도맥충형지진동작용,가이채용등효선성화방법진행분석。저충주법시합리적、유효적。단시,대우근장“단향”속도대맥충형지진동작용,불괄의채용등효선성화방법진행분석,계산결과장회산생흔대오차,우기시불능반영장지영구위이화영구소성변형특정。
In order to explore the feasibility of equivalent linearization method, this paper takes the near?field strong ground motion with typical characteristics, specifically, one?way large velocity pulses with a large permanent dis?placement, and two?way large velocity pulses with no permanent displacement, as input, the applicable conditions of using equivalent linearization method to analyze the near?field site response of large velocity pulse are calculated and analyzed by self?examination method and qualitative comparison method of previous results. The results show that:for the weak and moderate two?way large velocity pulse?type near?field ground motions, the equivalent linear?ization method is reasonable and effective. However, the equivalent linearization method is not appropriate for one?way large velocity pulse?type near?field ground motion, the calculation result will have large error. In particular, it does not reflect permanent displacement and plastic deformation characteristics of site.