浙江预防医学
浙江預防醫學
절강예방의학
ZHEJIANG JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
2015年
9期
869-872
,共4页
王凤英%孙美姣%朱军礼%王俊艳%胡云卿
王鳳英%孫美姣%硃軍禮%王俊豔%鬍雲卿
왕봉영%손미교%주군례%왕준염%호운경
效果评价指标体系%德尔菲专家咨询法%健康促进医院
效果評價指標體繫%德爾菲專傢咨詢法%健康促進醫院
효과평개지표체계%덕이비전가자순법%건강촉진의원
Evaluation indicator system%Delphi consultation method%health promoting in hospital
目的:建立量化、实用的健康促进医院效果评价指标体系。方法采用德尔菲专家咨询法(Delphi)对20名专家进行2轮咨询,听取专家意见及建议,建立健康促进医院效果评价指标体系。结果20名专家平均年龄(42.75±5.20)岁,从事健康教育与促进工作平均年限(15.15±6.85)年,本科及以上学历,高级技术职称占80.00%。两轮专家应答率均为100.00%,权威系数 Cr =0.93±0.10。2轮咨询,专家对一、二、三级指标的协调系数均有统计学意义(P <0.05)。最终确定健康促进医院效果评价指标由组织建设、环境建设、患者健康教育、职工健康促进和院外健康教育等5个一级指标、14个二级指标及25个三级指标构成,各项指标重要程度平均分值为4.30~5.00,标准差为0.00~0.83,变异系数为0.000~0.182,均达到了设计要求。结论应用Delphi 法建立的评价指标体系各项指标重要度均较高。
目的:建立量化、實用的健康促進醫院效果評價指標體繫。方法採用德爾菲專傢咨詢法(Delphi)對20名專傢進行2輪咨詢,聽取專傢意見及建議,建立健康促進醫院效果評價指標體繫。結果20名專傢平均年齡(42.75±5.20)歲,從事健康教育與促進工作平均年限(15.15±6.85)年,本科及以上學歷,高級技術職稱佔80.00%。兩輪專傢應答率均為100.00%,權威繫數 Cr =0.93±0.10。2輪咨詢,專傢對一、二、三級指標的協調繫數均有統計學意義(P <0.05)。最終確定健康促進醫院效果評價指標由組織建設、環境建設、患者健康教育、職工健康促進和院外健康教育等5箇一級指標、14箇二級指標及25箇三級指標構成,各項指標重要程度平均分值為4.30~5.00,標準差為0.00~0.83,變異繫數為0.000~0.182,均達到瞭設計要求。結論應用Delphi 法建立的評價指標體繫各項指標重要度均較高。
목적:건립양화、실용적건강촉진의원효과평개지표체계。방법채용덕이비전가자순법(Delphi)대20명전가진행2륜자순,은취전가의견급건의,건립건강촉진의원효과평개지표체계。결과20명전가평균년령(42.75±5.20)세,종사건강교육여촉진공작평균년한(15.15±6.85)년,본과급이상학력,고급기술직칭점80.00%。량륜전가응답솔균위100.00%,권위계수 Cr =0.93±0.10。2륜자순,전가대일、이、삼급지표적협조계수균유통계학의의(P <0.05)。최종학정건강촉진의원효과평개지표유조직건설、배경건설、환자건강교육、직공건강촉진화원외건강교육등5개일급지표、14개이급지표급25개삼급지표구성,각항지표중요정도평균분치위4.30~5.00,표준차위0.00~0.83,변이계수위0.000~0.182,균체도료설계요구。결론응용Delphi 법건립적평개지표체계각항지표중요도균교고。
Objective To establish a reasonable and practical evaluation indicator system for health promoting hospital. Methods According to the importance recognized by the experts,two round Delphi consultation was conducted to set up the indicator system of health promoting.Results A total of 20 experts participated in this study,with the average age of 42.75 ±5.20 years.The average years of work was 15.15 ±6.85 years.All of experts had bachelor degree and above,and 80.00% had senior technical titles.Questionnaire response rates of two round Delphi consultation were both 100.00%. The average coefficients of experts'authorities (Cr)was 0.93 ±0.10.There was statistically difference between the Kendall coefficients of two round consultations (P <0.05).The evaluation indicator system was finally established including 5 first-class indexes (organization construction, environment construction, patient health education, employee health promotion,and out -hospital health education),14 second -class indexes and 25 third -class indexes.The average scores of important degree among each index involved was 4.30 -5.00,with standard deviation 0.00 -0.83,and the coefficient of variation was 0.000 - 0.182,which met the design requirements.Conclusion The Delphi expert consultation method in this study have good representative,authoritative and coordination.