中国实用护理杂志
中國實用護理雜誌
중국실용호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL NURSING
2015年
26期
1999-2002
,共4页
董庆%徐旭娟%周凤艳%徐蓉%姜珍%赵小燕%钱多
董慶%徐旭娟%週鳳豔%徐蓉%薑珍%趙小燕%錢多
동경%서욱연%주봉염%서용%강진%조소연%전다
干燥综合征%疲乏%信度%效度
榦燥綜閤徵%疲乏%信度%效度
간조종합정%피핍%신도%효도
Sjogren′s syndrome%Fatigue%Reliability%Validity
目的:引进中文版疲乏概况量表(PROF)并初步评定其在干燥综合征患者中的适用性。方法采用Brislin翻译模式对英文版PROF汉化,并将中文版PROF应用于105例干燥综合征患者中,并对测定结果进行信效度检验。结果中文版PROF在干燥综合征患者中的Cronbachα系数为0.976,Guttman分半系数为0.953,重测信度为0.872,内容效度指数为0.875。采用探索性因子分析提取公因子2个,累积方差贡献率为80.75%,与源量表设计的二维度吻合。PROF与视觉模拟VAS量表的相关系数为0.621,与SF-36中精力分量表的相关系数为-0.707,效标效度较好。结论中文版PROF在我国干燥综合征患者中初步检验具有良好的信效度,可用于中国干燥综合征患者疲乏的评价和测量。
目的:引進中文版疲乏概況量錶(PROF)併初步評定其在榦燥綜閤徵患者中的適用性。方法採用Brislin翻譯模式對英文版PROF漢化,併將中文版PROF應用于105例榦燥綜閤徵患者中,併對測定結果進行信效度檢驗。結果中文版PROF在榦燥綜閤徵患者中的Cronbachα繫數為0.976,Guttman分半繫數為0.953,重測信度為0.872,內容效度指數為0.875。採用探索性因子分析提取公因子2箇,纍積方差貢獻率為80.75%,與源量錶設計的二維度吻閤。PROF與視覺模擬VAS量錶的相關繫數為0.621,與SF-36中精力分量錶的相關繫數為-0.707,效標效度較好。結論中文版PROF在我國榦燥綜閤徵患者中初步檢驗具有良好的信效度,可用于中國榦燥綜閤徵患者疲乏的評價和測量。
목적:인진중문판피핍개황량표(PROF)병초보평정기재간조종합정환자중적괄용성。방법채용Brislin번역모식대영문판PROF한화,병장중문판PROF응용우105례간조종합정환자중,병대측정결과진행신효도검험。결과중문판PROF재간조종합정환자중적Cronbachα계수위0.976,Guttman분반계수위0.953,중측신도위0.872,내용효도지수위0.875。채용탐색성인자분석제취공인자2개,루적방차공헌솔위80.75%,여원량표설계적이유도문합。PROF여시각모의VAS량표적상관계수위0.621,여SF-36중정력분량표적상관계수위-0.707,효표효도교호。결론중문판PROF재아국간조종합정환자중초보검험구유량호적신효도,가용우중국간조종합정환자피핍적평개화측량。
Objective To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Profile of Fatigue Scale (PROF)among the patients with Sjogren′s syndrome. Methods The English version of PROF was translated into Chinese according to Brislin Translation Model. 107 patients with Sjogren′s syndrome were investigated to test its reliability and validity. Results The Cronbachαcoefficient , Guttman split-half coefficient, test-retest reliability and content validity of Chinese version of PROF were 0.976, 0.953, 0.872 and 0.875. Two factors were extracted by factor analysis and the cumulated variance was 80.75%. The structure of PROF was in line with the original scale. The criterion-related validity was 0.621 measured by comparing with visual analog scale of fatigue, and was -0.707 measured by comparing with vitality domain in the MOS item Short From Health Survey (SF-36). Conclusions The Chinese version of PROF has been proved to be reliable and valid. It can be used to measure the fatigue in Chinese patients with Sjogren′s syndrome.