中国实用护理杂志
中國實用護理雜誌
중국실용호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL NURSING
2015年
25期
1889-1893
,共5页
李红梅%刘爱梅%高欢玲%兰赛玉
李紅梅%劉愛梅%高歡玲%蘭賽玉
리홍매%류애매%고환령%란새옥
评价研究%护理专科生%临床护理能力
評價研究%護理專科生%臨床護理能力
평개연구%호리전과생%림상호리능력
Evaluation studies%Higher vocational nursing student%Clinical nursing competence
目的:构建高职护理技能大赛临床护理能力的评价指标体系。方法采用Delphi法对31名护理专家进行3轮问卷咨询并对最终指标体系进行实证检验。结果3轮咨询的有效问卷分别为93.6%(29/31)、100.0%(29/29)和100.0%(29/29);权威系数为0.861;协调系数分别为0.207、0.291和0.371,P<0.01;整体信度系数为0.921,评价者信度相关系数为0.942;各条目与总分之间均存在显著相关,P<0.05;整体区分度为0.523。最终确立由3个一级指标、10个二级指标和39个条目构成的高职护理技能大赛临床护理能力评价指标体系。结论本研究咨询结果可靠,信度、效度和区分度高,为大赛评估高职护理学生临床护理能力提供了科学依据。
目的:構建高職護理技能大賽臨床護理能力的評價指標體繫。方法採用Delphi法對31名護理專傢進行3輪問捲咨詢併對最終指標體繫進行實證檢驗。結果3輪咨詢的有效問捲分彆為93.6%(29/31)、100.0%(29/29)和100.0%(29/29);權威繫數為0.861;協調繫數分彆為0.207、0.291和0.371,P<0.01;整體信度繫數為0.921,評價者信度相關繫數為0.942;各條目與總分之間均存在顯著相關,P<0.05;整體區分度為0.523。最終確立由3箇一級指標、10箇二級指標和39箇條目構成的高職護理技能大賽臨床護理能力評價指標體繫。結論本研究咨詢結果可靠,信度、效度和區分度高,為大賽評估高職護理學生臨床護理能力提供瞭科學依據。
목적:구건고직호리기능대새림상호리능력적평개지표체계。방법채용Delphi법대31명호리전가진행3륜문권자순병대최종지표체계진행실증검험。결과3륜자순적유효문권분별위93.6%(29/31)、100.0%(29/29)화100.0%(29/29);권위계수위0.861;협조계수분별위0.207、0.291화0.371,P<0.01;정체신도계수위0.921,평개자신도상관계수위0.942;각조목여총분지간균존재현저상관,P<0.05;정체구분도위0.523。최종학립유3개일급지표、10개이급지표화39개조목구성적고직호리기능대새림상호리능력평개지표체계。결론본연구자순결과가고,신도、효도화구분도고,위대새평고고직호이학생림상호리능력제공료과학의거。
Objective To construct the evaluation index system of clinical nursing competence for higher vocational nursing skills contest. Methods A total of 31 nursing experts participated in the three-round consultation by Delphi technique, and empirically tested the final result. Results The response rates of questionnaire investigation for the three-round were 93.6%(29/31),100.0%(29/29) and 100.0%(29/29) respectively. The specialist authority coefficient was 0.861,and the coordination coefficients for each round were 0.207,0.291 and 0.371, respectively, P<0.01.The overall reliability coefficient was 0.921, evaluators reliability correlation coefficient was 0.942. There were significant correlation between each item and total score, P<0.05. The overall degree of differentiation was 0.523. Finally, the clinical nursing competence assessment system for higher vocational nursing skills contest was constructed,including 3 first-level indexes,10 second-level indexes and 39 third-level items. Conclusions The results of three-round expert consultation are reliable, the reliability, validity and differentiation are high. To evaluate clinical nursing ability higher vocational nursing students provide scientific basis.