中国社区医师
中國社區醫師
중국사구의사
Chinese Community Doctors
2015年
26期
131-132
,共2页
骨密度%常规护理干预%综合护理干预%护理效果
骨密度%常規護理榦預%綜閤護理榦預%護理效果
골밀도%상규호리간예%종합호리간예%호리효과
Bone density%Routine nursing intervention%Comprehensive nursing intervention%Nursing effect
目的：探讨护理干预对老年骨质疏松症患者骨密度的影响。方法：收治老年骨质疏松症患者102例，随机分为两组，各51例，对照组采用常规护理干预，试验组在常规护理的基础上采用综合护理干预，观察两组患者的护理效果。结果：试验组护理总有效率98.0%明显高于对照组的82.4%(χ2=5.433，P＜0.05)；干预后，试验组腰椎正位L2～4骨密度和股骨近端骨密度分别为(0.835±0.136)g/cm2、(0.735±0.12)g/cm2，增高幅度明显高于对照组的(0.768±0.131) g/cm2、(0.649±0.114)g/cm2，差异具有统计学意义(ta=2.534，tb=3.662，P＜0.05)。结论：综合护理干预能有效增加患者骨密度。
目的：探討護理榦預對老年骨質疏鬆癥患者骨密度的影響。方法：收治老年骨質疏鬆癥患者102例，隨機分為兩組，各51例，對照組採用常規護理榦預，試驗組在常規護理的基礎上採用綜閤護理榦預，觀察兩組患者的護理效果。結果：試驗組護理總有效率98.0%明顯高于對照組的82.4%(χ2=5.433，P＜0.05)；榦預後，試驗組腰椎正位L2～4骨密度和股骨近耑骨密度分彆為(0.835±0.136)g/cm2、(0.735±0.12)g/cm2，增高幅度明顯高于對照組的(0.768±0.131) g/cm2、(0.649±0.114)g/cm2，差異具有統計學意義(ta=2.534，tb=3.662，P＜0.05)。結論：綜閤護理榦預能有效增加患者骨密度。
목적：탐토호리간예대노년골질소송증환자골밀도적영향。방법：수치노년골질소송증환자102례，수궤분위량조，각51례，대조조채용상규호리간예，시험조재상규호리적기출상채용종합호리간예，관찰량조환자적호리효과。결과：시험조호리총유효솔98.0%명현고우대조조적82.4%(χ2=5.433，P＜0.05)；간예후，시험조요추정위L2～4골밀도화고골근단골밀도분별위(0.835±0.136)g/cm2、(0.735±0.12)g/cm2，증고폭도명현고우대조조적(0.768±0.131) g/cm2、(0.649±0.114)g/cm2，차이구유통계학의의(ta=2.534，tb=3.662，P＜0.05)。결론：종합호리간예능유효증가환자골밀도。
Objective:To discuss the influence of nursing intervention on elderly patients with osteoporosis bone mineral density. Methods:102 patients with senile osteoporosis were selected.They were randomly divided into two groups,each of 51 cases.The control group were given routine nursing intervention.The experimental group were given comprehensive nursing intervention on the basis of routine nursing.Nursing efficacy results were observed in the two groups of patients.Results:The experimental group of nursing total efficiency of 98% was significantly higher than the control group of 82.4%(χ2=5.433,P<0.05).After the intervention, the experimental group of patients with lumbar spine L2~4 bone mineral density and bone mineral density of proximal femur were(0.835±0.136)g/cm2 and (0.735±0.12)g/cm2,which were significantly higher than those of the control group of(0.768±0.131) g/cm2 and (0.649 ± 0.114)g/cm2,and the differences were statistically significant(ta=2.534,tb=3.662,P<0.05).Conclusion:Comprehensive nursing intervention can effectively improve the bone density of patients.
