CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨全身智能康复系统对卒中后抑郁的临床疗效比较。方法对56例脑卒中后抑郁的患者分为观察组和对照组，对照组采用常规抗抑郁药物治疗，重度抑郁患者行心理干预，观察组在对照组治疗的基础上增加全身智能康复系统训练，通过对治疗前、治疗后4周、治疗后8周行HAMD-17评分和MBI评分，比较两组间治疗效果的差异。结果观察组治疗的总有效率高于对照组，两组间HAMD-17评分和MBI评分差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论全身智能康复系统治疗卒中后抑郁能更有效改善抑郁症状，提高日常生活活动能力。
목적：탐토전신지능강복계통대졸중후억욱적림상료효비교。방법대56례뇌졸중후억욱적환자분위관찰조화대조조，대조조채용상규항억욱약물치료，중도억욱환자행심리간예，관찰조재대조조치료적기출상증가전신지능강복계통훈련，통과대치료전、치료후4주、치료후8주행HAMD-17평분화MBI평분，비교량조간치료효과적차이。결과관찰조치료적총유효솔고우대조조，량조간HAMD-17평분화MBI평분차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05)。결론전신지능강복계통치료졸중후억욱능경유효개선억욱증상，제고일상생활활동능력。
Objective To explore the clinical curative effect comparison of whole-body intelligent recuperation sys-temto treat post-stroke depression .Methods 56 patients with post-stroke depression were divided into observation group and control group .The control group were given conventional antidepressant drug treatment and the patients with severe depression were given psychological intervention while the observation group were treated with whole-body in-telligent recuperation systemtraining on the basis of the treatment for the control group .HA mD-17 scores and MBI scores were conducted before the treatment,4 weeks after the treatment,8 weeks after the treatment,and the differ-ences of curative effects between the two groups were compared .Results The total effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group ,and the differences of HA mD-17 scores and MBI scores between the two groups had statistical significance (P<0.05).Conclusion whole-body intelligent recuperation systemto treat post-stroke depression can more effectively improve the symptoms of depression and increase the activities of daily living.