CAJ | 학술논문

秦末山东地区的起事表明,将民间“私性”的伦理关系彻底排斥净尽的官僚制度,极高明但不中庸,根本不可行。汉朝统治者有鉴于秦朝速亡的教训,遂“通古今之变”,既在整体上沿袭秦帝国的总体政治规模,又吸取周代宗法政治的遗意,在政治实践中尽量将帝国官僚制度的“抽象性”“公共性”与中国社会民间大量具体的“私性”关系融为一体,较好地处理了帝国时代的政治难题,保证了帝国的统一和施政的效率。
진말산동지구적기사표명,장민간“사성”적윤리관계철저배척정진적관료제도,겁고명단불중용,근본불가행。한조통치자유감우진조속망적교훈,수“통고금지변”,기재정체상연습진제국적총체정치규모,우흡취주대종법정치적유의,재정치실천중진량장제국관료제도적“추상성”“공공성”여중국사회민간대량구체적“사성”관계융위일체,교호지처리료제국시대적정치난제,보증료제국적통일화시정적효솔。
Upon the establishment of Qin Dynasty, the administrative system characterized by imperial system and the system of prefectures and counties was fully established. The “hegemony” political theory which emphasized “abstractness” and “public” was therefore came true. But the uprising in Shandong in the late Qin demonstrated that the administrative system which totally repelled the ethnic relationship of “privacy” was not feasible. Han Dynasty combined the political system of Qin Dynasty and the political thou...