社会学研究
社會學研究
사회학연구
Sociological Research
2001年
2期
33~48
,共null页
张德胜 金耀基 陈海文 陈健民 杨中芳 赵志裕 伊莎白
張德勝 金耀基 陳海文 陳健民 楊中芳 趙誌裕 伊莎白
장덕성 금요기 진해문 진건민 양중방 조지유 이사백
儒家思想 中庸理性 工具理性 价值理性 沟通理性
儒傢思想 中庸理性 工具理性 價值理性 溝通理性
유가사상 중용이성 공구이성 개치이성 구통이성
This paper analyses the zhongyong mode of orientation in the Confucian tradition from a social scientific perspective. It consists of three parts. Part One discusses different types of rationality and then points out that the most fundamental problem inadvanced modern society is what may be called the "paradox of reason", to which Habermas' communicative rationality is hardly a practical solution. Part Two portrays zhongyong as a rational mode of orientation, which is neither instrumental-rational nor value-rational but a mixture of both. It also argues that zhongyong rationality has greater potential than communicative rationality, as far as offering a solution to the above-mentioned problem is concerned. Part Three examines the traces of the zhongyong mode of orientation among contemporary Chinese by examining three sets of data, namely,a qualitative study of Confucian entrepreneurs in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Malaysia and Singapore, a survey study of social values of the residents in five Chinese communities, and a study of conflict resolution among peasants in a village in Guangdong Province.
This paper analyses the zhongyong mode of orientation in the Confucian tradition from a social scientific perspective. It consists of three parts. Part One discusses different types of rationality and then points out that the most fundamental problem inadvanced modern society is what may be called the "paradox of reason", to which Habermas' communicative rationality is hardly a practical solution. Part Two portrays zhongyong as a rational mode of orientation, which is neither instrumental-rational nor value-rational but a mixture of both. It also argues that zhongyong rationality has greater potential than communicative rationality, as far as offering a solution to the above-mentioned problem is concerned. Part Three examines the traces of the zhongyong mode of orientation among contemporary Chinese by examining three sets of data, namely,a qualitative study of Confucian entrepreneurs in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Malaysia and Singapore, a survey study of social values of the residents in five Chinese communities, and a study of conflict resolution among peasants in a village in Guangdong Province.
This paper analyses the zhongyong mode of orientation in the Confucian tradition from a social scientific perspective. It consists of three parts. Part One discusses different types of rationality and then points out that the most fundamental problem inadvanced modern society is what may be called the "paradox of reason", to which Habermas' communicative rationality is hardly a practical solution. Part Two portrays zhongyong as a rational mode of orientation, which is neither instrumental-rational nor value-rational but a mixture of both. It also argues that zhongyong rationality has greater potential than communicative rationality, as far as offering a solution to the above-mentioned problem is concerned. Part Three examines the traces of the zhongyong mode of orientation among contemporary Chinese by examining three sets of data, namely,a qualitative study of Confucian entrepreneurs in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Malaysia and Singapore, a survey study of social values of the residents in five Chinese communities, and a study of conflict resolution among peasants in a village in Guangdong Province.
