南开管理评论
南開管理評論
남개관리평론
Nankai Business Review
2005年
4期
12~17
,共null页
服务失误归因 服务补救 满意度 再购买意愿 正面口碑传播意愿 服务失误 顾客满意度 归因 负面影响 购后行为
服務失誤歸因 服務補救 滿意度 再購買意願 正麵口碑傳播意願 服務失誤 顧客滿意度 歸因 負麵影響 購後行為
복무실오귀인 복무보구 만의도 재구매의원 정면구비전파의원 복무실오 고객만의도 귀인 부면영향 구후행위
Service Failure Attributions; Servic Recovery; Customer Satisfaction; Repurchase Intention; Positive Word-of-mouth
服务失误是企业所竭力避免的,实践和学术研究都表明,在遭遇服务失误后,顾客满意度和顾客再购买意愿都会下降,而不同原因导致的服务失误对顾客满意度和购后行为的影响也不同.本文对于服务失误的原因重新做了分类,除了既有研究已关注的"内因"和"外因"外,补充了可能导致服务失误的第三方原因.通过情景模拟实验法,比较了这三种原因的服务失误对顾客满意度和购后行为的影响.结果发现,"外因"导致的服务失误对于顾客的负面影响最大,"内因"导致的服务失误对于顾客的负面影响最小,第三方导致的服务失误对于顾客的负面影响介于前两者之间.但无论是什么原因导致的服务失误,相同的服务补救引发的顾客反应是相同的.
服務失誤是企業所竭力避免的,實踐和學術研究都錶明,在遭遇服務失誤後,顧客滿意度和顧客再購買意願都會下降,而不同原因導緻的服務失誤對顧客滿意度和購後行為的影響也不同.本文對于服務失誤的原因重新做瞭分類,除瞭既有研究已關註的"內因"和"外因"外,補充瞭可能導緻服務失誤的第三方原因.通過情景模擬實驗法,比較瞭這三種原因的服務失誤對顧客滿意度和購後行為的影響.結果髮現,"外因"導緻的服務失誤對于顧客的負麵影響最大,"內因"導緻的服務失誤對于顧客的負麵影響最小,第三方導緻的服務失誤對于顧客的負麵影響介于前兩者之間.但無論是什麽原因導緻的服務失誤,相同的服務補救引髮的顧客反應是相同的.
복무실오시기업소갈력피면적,실천화학술연구도표명,재조우복무실오후,고객만의도화고객재구매의원도회하강,이불동원인도치적복무실오대고객만의도화구후행위적영향야불동.본문대우복무실오적원인중신주료분류,제료기유연구이관주적"내인"화"외인"외,보충료가능도치복무실오적제삼방원인.통과정경모의실험법,비교료저삼충원인적복무실오대고객만의도화구후행위적영향.결과발현,"외인"도치적복무실오대우고객적부면영향최대,"내인"도치적복무실오대우고객적부면영향최소,제삼방도치적복무실오대우고객적부면영향개우전량자지간.단무론시십요원인도치적복무실오,상동적복무보구인발적고객반응시상동적.
Service failure is what enterprises try their best to avoid. Experience and research hitherto all suggest that when encountered service failure, customer satisfaction, repurchase intention and positive word-of-mouth intention would fail respectively. However, different failure attributions would have different impact on the above three aspects. This paper has re-categorized the possible causes for service failure, in addition to "internal" and "external" cause dimensions, we have included "the third party" dimension. Taking scenariobased experiment, it attempts to compare the influences of three attributions (the employee, the customer himself and the third party) on customer satisfaction, repurchase intention and positive word-of-mouth intention. Just find out that compared with the other two causes, when the attribution goes to the "external" cause, the service failure would have the most serious negative impact on customers. When the attribution goes to the "internal" cause, it turns out to be much better. And the third party's impact is between the above two causes. However, no matter what the attribution is, the same service recovery will have the same effect.