河北法学
河北法學
하북법학
Hebei Law Science
2005年
10期
89~92
,共null页
民事诉讼 审前程序 建议
民事訴訟 審前程序 建議
민사소송 심전정서 건의
the procedure before examining ; accusation procedure ; suggestions
民事诉讼中的审前程序是开庭审理前的一个重要诉讼阶段,我国<中华人民共和国民事诉讼法>(下称<民诉法>)及最高法院的相关司法解释都对审前程序的相关制度做了规定.但这些规定较零散,不成体系,相互之间缺乏协调,甚至相互矛盾;又由于在司法实践中,各地法院情况不一,法官的理解、认知能力不一,导致在实践中操作也不一致.现在各地法院摸索创新出的许多民事审前程序规则实际上带有程序规则与实体规则存在的双重困惑:既不能保持已有的审前程序的正当性与效率性,又难以体现我国现有审判方式改革后所要求达到的公正与效率的目标.规范、统一审前准备程序,改变诉讼拖延和民事诉讼程序过程中规定散乱、执行标准不一的状况,是民事诉讼制度从改革走向完善,从宏观到微观的必然.
民事訴訟中的審前程序是開庭審理前的一箇重要訴訟階段,我國<中華人民共和國民事訴訟法>(下稱<民訴法>)及最高法院的相關司法解釋都對審前程序的相關製度做瞭規定.但這些規定較零散,不成體繫,相互之間缺乏協調,甚至相互矛盾;又由于在司法實踐中,各地法院情況不一,法官的理解、認知能力不一,導緻在實踐中操作也不一緻.現在各地法院摸索創新齣的許多民事審前程序規則實際上帶有程序規則與實體規則存在的雙重睏惑:既不能保持已有的審前程序的正噹性與效率性,又難以體現我國現有審判方式改革後所要求達到的公正與效率的目標.規範、統一審前準備程序,改變訴訟拖延和民事訴訟程序過程中規定散亂、執行標準不一的狀況,是民事訴訟製度從改革走嚮完善,從宏觀到微觀的必然.
민사소송중적심전정서시개정심리전적일개중요소송계단,아국<중화인민공화국민사소송법>(하칭<민소법>)급최고법원적상관사법해석도대심전정서적상관제도주료규정.단저사규정교령산,불성체계,상호지간결핍협조,심지상호모순;우유우재사법실천중,각지법원정황불일,법관적리해、인지능력불일,도치재실천중조작야불일치.현재각지법원모색창신출적허다민사심전정서규칙실제상대유정서규칙여실체규칙존재적쌍중곤혹:기불능보지이유적심전정서적정당성여효솔성,우난이체현아국현유심판방식개혁후소요구체도적공정여효솔적목표.규범、통일심전준비정서,개변소송타연화민사소송정서과정중규정산란、집행표준불일적상황,시민사소송제도종개혁주향완선,종굉관도미관적필연.
The procedure before exanfining is one of important steps of accusation procedure before holding ahearing. Our country's civil procedure law of People's Republic of China (In the following it is called civil procedure law) and the related judicial definition of supreme people' s court have given the related regulations about procedure before examining. But the regulations are scattered without any system. In addition, they are not able to coordinate with other and even contradict in practical operation. Actually, now many procedures before civil examining which was groped and initiated by courts are puzzled dually by procedure rule and substance rule. As a result, neither can the appropriateness and efficiency of existed procedures be/ore examining be preserved, nor can the aim of fairness and efficiency which our present judicial means reform examining and change the delay of accusation, the difference of standard and disorder of rules are inevitable in development of civil procedure regulation from reform to improvement, from macroscopic view to microcosmic view.