CAJ | 학술논문

学术期刊之退稿率向来为学术界采具同侪评阅(peer review)要求下,所并随产生与要求呈具的资料.它通常亦被用作证明期刊品质控制良窳之标准之一.然而,因定义与界定不清,使得退稿率之实质意义并不如预期,也有失公允.本文即为举证退稿率要求之不当,并提出适当之改进建议,俾使学术期刊评价能更合乎公平客观.
학술기간지퇴고솔향래위학술계채구동제평열(peer review)요구하,소병수산생여요구정구적자료.타통상역피용작증명기간품질공제량유지표준지일.연이,인정의여계정불청,사득퇴고솔지실질의의병불여예기,야유실공윤.본문즉위거증퇴고솔요구지불당,병제출괄당지개진건의,비사학술기간평개능경합호공평객관.
The rejection rate of scholarly journals has usually been used and accompanied with the evidence of peer review for the quality control. However, the rate of rejected papers is neither significant nor meaningful as expected because of an ambiguous definition. This study found that the necessity of rejection rate for journal evaluation is not clearly proved. Suggestions are also given, along with several reasons.