CAJ | 학술논문

在交通肇事罪的认定和处理中,仍坚持传统的旧过失论是不合时宜的,我们应当借鉴国外现处于主流地位的新过失论,以期正确处理交通事故;我们在交通事故的处理中不应承认所谓的共同过失犯罪、过失教唆犯以及监督过失.在人来人往的地点和时间,交通肇事后逃逸致人死亡,构成交通肇事罪与遗弃罪的想像竞合;在人迹稀少的地点和时间,交通肇事后逃逸致人死亡,构成交通肇事罪与不作为的故意杀人罪,均只需以交通肇事罪定罪处刑即可.
재교통조사죄적인정화처리중,잉견지전통적구과실론시불합시의적,아문응당차감국외현처우주류지위적신과실론,이기정학처리교통사고;아문재교통사고적처리중불응승인소위적공동과실범죄、과실교사범이급감독과실.재인래인왕적지점화시간,교통조사후도일치인사망,구성교통조사죄여유기죄적상상경합;재인적희소적지점화시간,교통조사후도일치인사망,구성교통조사죄여불작위적고의살인죄,균지수이교통조사죄정죄처형즉가.
In the determined and disposition of the crime of causing traffic casualties, the traditional theory of old offense is not appropriate to the occasion. We should use the theory of new offense, which is in position of main trend of othei： countries for reference to dispose the traffic accident correctly. We should not admit the joint offense though negligence, instigator through negligent and supervision offense in the disposition of traffic accidents. In the place and time of coming and going in great number, if a person escapes after traffic casualty and causes death, it will convict the imaginative joiner of offense of the crime of causing traffic casualties and the crime of abandonment. Under reverse situation it will convict the crime of causing trafficc casualties and the crime of intentional homicide negatively. And both of them could convict the crime of causing traffic casualties to convict and criminally punish.