CAJ | 학술논문

采用问卷调查法、文献资料法、因果类比、对称类比等主要方法,对广州市与沈阳市部分大学生的健康素质现状进行比较研究,结果表明:广州市大学生生理、心理、社会健康子量表分和总量表分分别为137.71分、106.18分、89.74分和333.63分(换算成百分制分别为81分、70.79分、74.78分和75.83分),水平评价分别为良好下限、中等下限、中等中限和中等中限.沈阳市大学生生理、心理、社会健康子量表分和总量表分分别为115.64分、82.31分、97.24分和295.18分(换算成百分制分别为68.02分、54.87分、81.03分和67.09分),水平评价分别为及格上限、不及格、良好下限和及格上限.广州市大学生健康素质总体高于沈阳市大学生,其中生理、心理健康高于沈阳市大学生,社会健康低于沈阳市大学生.反映出南北两市大学生健康素质存在的差异.
채용문권조사법、문헌자료법、인과류비、대칭류비등주요방법,대엄주시여침양시부분대학생적건강소질현상진행비교연구,결과표명:엄주시대학생생리、심리、사회건강자량표분화총량표분분별위137.71분、106.18분、89.74분화333.63분(환산성백분제분별위81분、70.79분、74.78분화75.83분),수평평개분별위량호하한、중등하한、중등중한화중등중한.침양시대학생생리、심리、사회건강자량표분화총량표분분별위115.64분、82.31분、97.24분화295.18분(환산성백분제분별위68.02분、54.87분、81.03분화67.09분),수평평개분별위급격상한、불급격、량호하한화급격상한.엄주시대학생건강소질총체고우침양시대학생,기중생리、심리건강고우침양시대학생,사회건강저우침양시대학생.반영출남북량시대학생건강소질존재적차이.
Comparison was made on the health quality of some college students in Guangzhou and Shenyang with adoption of questionnaire, literature research, cause-and-effect comparison and symmetry analogy. The result revealed that the scores of sub-total table and total table about physiological, psychological and social health of students in Guangzhou were respectively 137.71,106.18,89.74 and 333.63 （if converted into hundred-point system, the scores were 81,70.79,74.78 and 75.83）. The evaluations were lower limit of good level,lower limit of middle level, middle limit of middle level and middle limit of middle level. The scores of physiological, psychological and social health of students in Shenyang were respectively 115.64, 82.31,97.24 and 295.18（if changed into hundred point system, the scores were 60.02,54.87,81.03 and 67.09）. Evaluations were upper limit of pass, failure,lower limit of excellence and upper limit of pass. The overall health quality of students in Guangzhou was better than those in Shenyang,among which the physiological and psychological health was better and social health was lower.