湖南公安高等专科学校学报
湖南公安高等專科學校學報
호남공안고등전과학교학보
Journal of Huan Public Security College
2006年
2期
103~104
,共null页
闭合性颅脑损伤 临床诊断 法医鉴定 结论差并分析
閉閤性顱腦損傷 臨床診斷 法醫鑒定 結論差併分析
폐합성로뇌손상 림상진단 법의감정 결론차병분석
closed craniocerebral injury; clinical diagnosis; forensic identification; analysis of conclusion difference
有关闭合性颅脑损伤的临床诊断与法医鉴定的结论往往存在着差异，在脑震荡和脑损伤后综合症诊断上，这种差异尤为突出。差异的形成主要缘于临床诊断：临床医生过分依赖主诉；自信、草率、违反医理；对病人辅助检查不够；易受社会和人为因素干扰。
有關閉閤性顱腦損傷的臨床診斷與法醫鑒定的結論往往存在著差異，在腦震盪和腦損傷後綜閤癥診斷上，這種差異尤為突齣。差異的形成主要緣于臨床診斷：臨床醫生過分依賴主訴；自信、草率、違反醫理；對病人輔助檢查不夠；易受社會和人為因素榦擾。
유관폐합성로뇌손상적림상진단여법의감정적결론왕왕존재착차이，재뇌진탕화뇌손상후종합증진단상，저충차이우위돌출。차이적형성주요연우림상진단：림상의생과분의뢰주소；자신、초솔、위반의리；대병인보조검사불구；역수사회화인위인소간우。
Because of the different role of examiner, the goal and method difference as well as other factors disturbances existing in the clinical diagnosis and the forensic identification of closed craniocerebral injury, the conclusions often appear differently. The comparison between clinical diagnosis and forensic identification of 120 cases of closed craniocerebral injury, studying on the rules and reasons of the differences, not only is helpful to the legal medical documentation examination, but of important reference significance to the judicial organ to deal with this kind of case.
