CAJ | 학술논문

摘要：《毛诗·小雅·都人士》首章“彼都人士，狐裘黄黄。其容不改，出盲有章。行归于周，万民所望”，《左传·襄公十四年》引与本章后两句相同，而服虔注以为逸诗。《礼记·缁衣》引与本章几乎全同，而郑玄注以为“此诗毛氏有之，三束则亡”。《左传》为古文经，为何所引诗见于同属古文的《毛诗》，服虔却以为逸诗？今本小藏《札记》应该属于今文系统，所引诗，已往学者也都归入三家诗，而郑注为什么会说三家诗没有呢？这些疑点，透过出土材料《孔子诗论》，肯定先泰确实有异干齐、鲁、韩、毛四束以外的诗学，文字和诠释都有所不同，服虔所谓逸诗，当是见于这种类似材料；透过熹平石经，应肯定石经所载鲁诗确实没有《都人士》首章，齐、韩当同，郑玄注也没有问题。
적요：《모시·소아·도인사》수장“피도인사，호구황황。기용불개，출맹유장。행귀우주，만민소망”，《좌전·양공십사년》인여본장후량구상동，이복건주이위일시。《례기·치의》인여본장궤호전동，이정현주이위“차시모씨유지，삼속칙망”。《좌전》위고문경，위하소인시견우동속고문적《모시》，복건각이위일시？금본소장《찰기》응해속우금문계통，소인시，이왕학자야도귀입삼가시，이정주위십요회설삼가시몰유니？저사의점，투과출토재료《공자시론》，긍정선태학실유이간제、로、한、모사속이외적시학，문자화전석도유소불동，복건소위일시，당시견우저충유사재료；투과희평석경，응긍정석경소재로시학실몰유《도인사》수장，제、한당동，정현주야몰유문제。
The author of the paper performs a comparative study of the different versions of the first stanza in Festal Songs＂ Durenshi. Whereas the concluding two lines of the poem are considered as the same in Zuozhuan, it is taken as only the prelude by Fu Qian and Zheng Xuan. Now that Zuozhuan and Mao＇ s Poetry are both classics, why does Fu Qian hold a different point of view？ The key to the mystery is found in the unearthed work, Confucius on Poetry, i.e. , apart from the four schools of poetry of Qi, Lu, Han, and Mao, other analects may possibly vary. Likewise, neither Zheng Xuan, nor Fu Qian is wrong. Xipingshijing maintains that the first chapter of Festal Songs＂ Durenshi is lost.