CAJ | 학술논문

所有权变动模式以行为人是否享有充分自由为标准可分为“意思自由”和“公示要件”两种模式,“公示要件”模式的交易安全优势并非如通常所说得那样明显,而其对私法自治原则、生活的“自然”状态却导致较大的损害,产生“所有人”自己都不承认为自己是所有人的所有权等违背生活逻辑的现象,与社会生活逻辑难以一致,与权利的本质相悖.而意思自由模式是权利本质的要求,反映了生活的实际,学界对意思自由模式的批评多不成立.考量两者的价值损益,意思自由模式为优.
소유권변동모식이행위인시부향유충분자유위표준가분위“의사자유”화“공시요건”량충모식,“공시요건”모식적교역안전우세병비여통상소설득나양명현,이기대사법자치원칙、생활적“자연”상태각도치교대적손해,산생“소유인”자기도불승인위자기시소유인적소유권등위배생활라집적현상,여사회생활라집난이일치,여권리적본질상패.이의사자유모식시권리본질적요구,반영료생활적실제,학계대의사자유모식적비평다불성립.고량량자적개치손익,의사자유모식위우.
In the light of whether or not the actor enjoys full freedom, the modes of ownership change can be categorized into two types： liberty of intention and open constitution. The advantage of the latter over the former that it can guarantee safety of transaction is not so prominent as it is thought to be because it is harmful to the autonomic principle of private law and the natural condition of life, and because it results in the real owner＇s denial of his own property right which runs counter to the logic of life and the nature of human right. However, liberty of intention reflects the nature of property right and the reality of life. Therefore, the criticisms leveled against the latter mode by scholars within the academic field are not justified. If the value of both modes is taken into consideration, liberty of intention is preferable.