CAJ | 학술논문

韩愈和柳宗元关于史官问题的辩论，发生于九世纪初唐宪宗元和年间。韩、柳辩论的问题，表面看来是史官可不可作？可不可有作为？如可为，应怎么作？其实涉及史官的职责、史官的命运、史馆的建置以及史学与政治的关系等等，可谓中世纪前期近千年以编纂当代史为重心的文化体制的一次总结和回顾。正因如此，就成了中国史学的历史进程中的一道难以回避的论题。
한유화류종원관우사관문제적변론，발생우구세기초당헌종원화년간。한、류변론적문제，표면간래시사관가불가작？가불가유작위？여가위，응즘요작？기실섭급사관적직책、사관적명운、사관적건치이급사학여정치적관계등등，가위중세기전기근천년이편찬당대사위중심적문화체제적일차총결화회고。정인여차，취성료중국사학적역사진정중적일도난이회피적론제。
The debate on official historian between Han and Liu occurred in the early 9th century, Yuan He year of Tang Xianzong Reign Period. At first sight, the debate appears focused on the problems whether there can be official historians, will the historians excel in achievement, and how to do if they will？ In fact, this debate has a bearing on the responsibilities and the fate of official historians, the establishment of historical bureau and the relation between history and politics, etc. It could be taken as a summary and a review of a cultural system with its center on contemporary history compiling for 1000 years in the earlier Middle Age. Thus it becomes an unavoidable problem in the course of Chinese historiography.