法学论坛
法學論罈
법학론단
Legal Forum
2006年
5期
108~114
,共null页
入户抢劫 司法判断 刑法解释
入戶搶劫 司法判斷 刑法解釋
입호창겁 사법판단 형법해석
Intruding into another person's residence to rob; Judicial judgment; Criminal law explanation
判断进入“前店后院”式场所抢劫是否属于“入户抢劫”,应当考查场所内部生活和经营区域是否相对分离和行为时是否属于营业期间;对于模糊期间场所的功能特征原则上应以“过渡期”前的状态为基础加以判断。入户抢劫的“户”不应限于被害人“户”,即使针对“户”中家庭成员以外的第三人抢劫也属于入户抢劫。入户抢劫包括主观评价因素在内,其内容包括对“人”的意思支配和对“户”的认识意识。
判斷進入“前店後院”式場所搶劫是否屬于“入戶搶劫”,應噹攷查場所內部生活和經營區域是否相對分離和行為時是否屬于營業期間;對于模糊期間場所的功能特徵原則上應以“過渡期”前的狀態為基礎加以判斷。入戶搶劫的“戶”不應限于被害人“戶”,即使針對“戶”中傢庭成員以外的第三人搶劫也屬于入戶搶劫。入戶搶劫包括主觀評價因素在內,其內容包括對“人”的意思支配和對“戶”的認識意識。
판단진입“전점후원”식장소창겁시부속우“입호창겁”,응당고사장소내부생활화경영구역시부상대분리화행위시시부속우영업기간;대우모호기간장소적공능특정원칙상응이“과도기”전적상태위기출가이판단。입호창겁적“호”불응한우피해인“호”,즉사침대“호”중가정성원이외적제삼인창겁야속우입호창겁。입호창겁포괄주관평개인소재내,기내용포괄대“인”적의사지배화대“호”적인식의식。
Judging that whether entering the type place of "front the shop rear court" to rob belongs to "Intruding into another person's residence to rob", factors should be taken into account that whether the place where interior lives and the business region are relatively separated and whether the behavior time belongs to the business time; Principally the judgment to the functional characteristic of fuzzy place should according to the condition before "the transition-period". "Intruding into another person's residence to rob ", it is not supposed to restrict the "residence" only in the victim's room, even rob a third person who is not the family member also belongs to"Intruding into another person' s residence to rob" Subjective factors should be considered in judging "Intruding into another person' s residence to rob" which include the understanding to "enter" and the understanding consciousness to "residence".