CAJ | 학술논문

鲁迅的《娜拉出走后怎么办》，让读者看到了鲁迅和易卜生在不同文化背景和价值取向下对女性解放及其命运的不同理解。娜拉的反抗被鲁迅从社会整体性去理解，显得尤其弱小与无奈。鲁迅更强调社会整体改变是女性解放和出路的基本前提保障，因此判给社会承担更多的责任。而易卜生从西方个性文化的角度强调个体觉悟与反抗的重要性。二位作家的不同选择看似纯主观的活动，但更具有内在的文化必然性。
로신적《나랍출주후즘요판》，양독자간도료로신화역복생재불동문화배경화개치취향하대녀성해방급기명운적불동리해。나랍적반항피로신종사회정체성거리해，현득우기약소여무내。로신경강조사회정체개변시녀성해방화출로적기본전제보장，인차판급사회승담경다적책임。이역복생종서방개성문화적각도강조개체각오여반항적중요성。이위작가적불동선택간사순주관적활동，단경구유내재적문화필연성。
From Lu Xun＇s ＂ After Nara Leaves Home ＂, readers can sense the different understandings of women＇s liberation and destiny by Lu Xun and Henrick Ibsen due to their different cultural backgrounds and values. As far as Lu Xun is concerned, he interprets Nara＇s revolt from the society as a whole, so her revolt is weak and has no alternative. Lu emphasizes that the change of the society as a whole is the basic prerequisite for women＇s liberation and way out and accordingly society should shoulder more responsibilities. Ibsen, by contrast, emphasizes the importance of individual＇s awareness and revolt from the western individual culture. Two writers＇ selections seem to be a purely subjective activity, but are internally determined by culture.