CAJ | 학술논문

在林纾的译作中出现了许多的“讹”，也引来了众多的批评。但是，这些“讹”经过分析后，大概可分为有意识和无意识两类，都可归为译者的“创造性叛逆”。当代西方文论中的释义学、符号学、解构主义、翻译研究派从各自的角度阐发了对文学翻译中叛逆性、创造性的观点，为“创造性叛逆”提供了理论视角。“创造性叛逆”突出了译者的主体地位，开拓了翻译研究的新视野。
재림서적역작중출현료허다적“와”，야인래료음다적비평。단시，저사“와”경과분석후，대개가분위유의식화무의식량류，도가귀위역자적“창조성반역”。당대서방문론중적석의학、부호학、해구주의、번역연구파종각자적각도천발료대문학번역중반역성、창조성적관점，위“창조성반역”제공료이론시각。“창조성반역”돌출료역자적주체지위，개탁료번역연구적신시야。
Many ＂errors＂ can be found in Lin Shu＇ s translation version. These ＂errors＂ have aroused criticism from the literature translation world. However, under careful analysis, these ＂errors＂ can be divided into two groups conscious ＂errors＂and unconscious ＂errors＂. Whether it is out of consciousness or unconsciousness, these ＂errors＂ are the production of the translator＇ s ＂creative betrayal＂. Contemporary literary theories of hermeneutics, semiotics, deconstruction and translation studies expressed their respective ideas on ＂betrayal＂ or ＂creation＂ in literature translation and provided theoretical backup to ＂creative betrayal＂. ＂Creative betrayal＂ highlights the translator＇ s subjectivity, opening up new perspectives toward translation study.