CAJ | 학술논문

“学院派”文学批评最明显的风格特征是将过去、现在乃至将来统统纳入自己的表达范围内，用极具前瞻性的语言来创造一种“怀乡”的体验。尽管在“学院派”批评中并不存在一个可以囊括一切的理论框架，但通过对不同研究价值取向以及不同研究范式之间的沟通与整合，一方面可以拓展（文学）研究的视野并确立其“视角”价值。另一方面可以发现或意识到各不相同的研究范式所存在的缺陷与不足，因而它带有浓厚的后现代性色彩。虽然“学院派”文学批评不是后现代主义思潮的逻辑产物，但它的发生无疑得益于“文化自觉”这样一个具有后现代性的全球化“语境”以及具有后现代性思维方式的表述策略。，借助于“后现代”视角，我们不仅可以更好地认识“学院派”文学批评这种“文本”，还可以更好地理解由此而建立起来的带有后现代主义特色的当代“批评文化”。
“학원파”문학비평최명현적풍격특정시장과거、현재내지장래통통납입자기적표체범위내，용겁구전첨성적어언래창조일충“부향”적체험。진관재“학원파”비평중병불존재일개가이낭괄일절적이론광가，단통과대불동연구개치취향이급불동연구범식지간적구통여정합，일방면가이탁전（문학）연구적시야병학립기“시각”개치。령일방면가이발현혹의식도각불상동적연구범식소존재적결함여불족，인이타대유농후적후현대성색채。수연“학원파”문학비평불시후현대주의사조적라집산물，단타적발생무의득익우“문화자각”저양일개구유후현대성적전구화“어경”이급구유후현대성사유방식적표술책략。，차조우“후현대”시각，아문불부가이경호지인식“학원파”문학비평저충“문본”，환가이경호지리해유차이건립기래적대유후현대주의특색적당대“비평문화”。
As for the academic criticism about literature,there is no universal principle or theory available,but by linking up all the different criticisms and exchanging various critical methods,it is evident to us that the academic criticism can not only enlarge the field of literature criticism but also find out the default of each critique,besides, academic criticism has developed somewhat unique conventional style of speech,which,to some extent,demonstrates postmodernism.It may be true that the academic criticism is not the logical product of the postmodernism,but from contemporary global cultural environment and the way of thinking,we can understand it better and can know what social effects and meanings it potentially gives.