心理学报
心理學報
심이학보
Acta Psychologica Sinica
2007年
2期
277~284
,共null页
王振宏 郭德俊 游旭群 高培霞
王振宏 郭德俊 遊旭群 高培霞
왕진굉 곽덕준 유욱군 고배하
自主神经活动 情绪唤醒 身体攻击行为。
自主神經活動 情緒喚醒 身體攻擊行為。
자주신경활동 정서환성 신체공격행위。
autonomic nervous activity, emotional arousal, physical aggressive behavior
运用情绪生理学的方法,以31名具有身体攻击行为的初中工读学生和30名普通初中生为研究对象,研究了身体攻击行为学生与普通学生在基线生理唤醒和情绪生理唤醒方面的不同特点。结果发现,在生理唤醒的基线水平上,身体攻击行为学生与普通学生在指温、R-R间期、心率、指脉率方面差异显著,身体攻击行为学生的指温、心率、指脉率比普通学生低,身体攻击行为学生的R-R间期比普通学生R-R间期长。在愤怒刺激条件下,身体攻击行为学生报告的愤怒体验水平比普通学生高;愤怒诱发刺激引起身体攻击行为学生R-R间期、心率变化显著,而普通学生R-R间期、心率变化不显著。厌恶与恐惧、悲伤、愉快诱发刺激引起普通学生皮肤电变化显著,而身体攻击行为学生皮肤电变化不显著。
運用情緒生理學的方法,以31名具有身體攻擊行為的初中工讀學生和30名普通初中生為研究對象,研究瞭身體攻擊行為學生與普通學生在基線生理喚醒和情緒生理喚醒方麵的不同特點。結果髮現,在生理喚醒的基線水平上,身體攻擊行為學生與普通學生在指溫、R-R間期、心率、指脈率方麵差異顯著,身體攻擊行為學生的指溫、心率、指脈率比普通學生低,身體攻擊行為學生的R-R間期比普通學生R-R間期長。在憤怒刺激條件下,身體攻擊行為學生報告的憤怒體驗水平比普通學生高;憤怒誘髮刺激引起身體攻擊行為學生R-R間期、心率變化顯著,而普通學生R-R間期、心率變化不顯著。厭噁與恐懼、悲傷、愉快誘髮刺激引起普通學生皮膚電變化顯著,而身體攻擊行為學生皮膚電變化不顯著。
운용정서생이학적방법,이31명구유신체공격행위적초중공독학생화30명보통초중생위연구대상,연구료신체공격행위학생여보통학생재기선생리환성화정서생리환성방면적불동특점。결과발현,재생리환성적기선수평상,신체공격행위학생여보통학생재지온、R-R간기、심솔、지맥솔방면차이현저,신체공격행위학생적지온、심솔、지맥솔비보통학생저,신체공격행위학생적R-R간기비보통학생R-R간기장。재분노자격조건하,신체공격행위학생보고적분노체험수평비보통학생고;분노유발자격인기신체공격행위학생R-R간기、심솔변화현저,이보통학생R-R간기、심솔변화불현저。염악여공구、비상、유쾌유발자격인기보통학생피부전변화현저,이신체공격행위학생피부전변화불현저。
Introduction The autonomic nerve activity pattern of antisocial spectrum behavior, including aggression, psychopathy, and conduct problems, has been examined in a number of studies over the past decades, especially in heart rate (HR) and skin conductance (SC). The findings indicated that aggression reliably though modestly associated with HR and SC in many cases. Low resting and task skin conductance were associated with conduct problems. Low resting HR and high HR reactivity were associated with aggression and conduct problems. However, the patterns of autonomic nervous activity are influenced by emotional valence of stimuli. Also aggression may be physical or relational. This study was conducted to explore the relations between physical aggression and autonomic activity, the different characteristics of autonomic activity among the students with and withoug physical aggressive behavior under conditions of different emotional valence of stimuli. Method Sixty one students attended the experiment of this study, including 31 students with physical aggressive behavior and 30 normal students. Physiological responses, including the finger temperature, skin conductance, R - R interval, heart rate, and finger pulse, were recorded using Biopac100PW under resting condition and condition of different emotional stimuli. There were four emotional stimuli, three film clips eliciting disgust and fear, sadness, and happiness, and one language material eliciting anger. Acqknowledge 100PW and SPSS 11.5 were used to analyze data. Results (1) There was a significant difference between students with physical aggressive behavior and normal students on the baseline of physiological activation such as finger temperature, finger pulse rate, heart rate, and R- R interval. Finger temperature, finger pulse rate and heart rate of students with physical aggressive behavior were lower than those of normal students and their R - R interval was longer than those of normal students. (2) In condition elicited anger, students with physical aggressive behavior reported higher level of anger experience than those of normal students. Significant difference of average changes in terms of R - R interval, heart rate existed between students with physical aggressive behavior and those of normal students when they read provocative and insulting language eliciting anger. The R - R interval, heart rate of students with physical aggressive behavior increased and those of normal students had no significant changes. (3)In condition eliciting disgust and fear, sadness, happiness, the skin conductance level of normal students changed more significantly than those of students with physical aggressive behavior. Conclusion The finding of this study showed that there were different patterns of autonomic activity between physical aggressive students and normal students. Autonomic activity of physical aggressive students is imbalance. They had higher HR under condition eliciting anger. So intervention of physical aggressive students needs to reshape their pattern of autonomic activity using biofeedback and other methods. It is also important to enhance their emotion- regulation competence.