CAJ | 학술논문

阐述和分析了组合评价法之后，指出目前组合评价法研究的不足，认为针对系统评价过程不同阶段的特点，选择相对最为有效的方法进行分阶段的串行评价更加具有实用价值。在归结了ISM、AHP、FE等方法的特点的基础上，提出IAF分阶段串行组合评价法，并归纳其特点。运用IAF组合评价法建立了工程项目全寿命周期的风险综合评价指标体系，并以两个工程项目风险为评价对象，全程阐述了IAF组合评价法的具体应用，得出了具有可比性的评价结果。
천술화분석료조합평개법지후，지출목전조합평개법연구적불족，인위침대계통평개과정불동계단적특점，선택상대최위유효적방법진행분계단적천행평개경가구유실용개치。재귀결료ISM、AHP、FE등방법적특점적기출상，제출IAF분계단천행조합평개법，병귀납기특점。운용IAF조합평개법건립료공정항목전수명주기적풍험종합평개지표체계，병이량개공정항목풍험위평개대상，전정천술료IAF조합평개법적구체응용，득출료구유가비성적평개결과。
Firstly, the shortage of research on combinatorial evaluating method is pointed out, and it is pro- posed that it is more valuable to choose the most valid method in comparison to carrying on string-going evaluation in every stage based on the characteristics of different stage in the system evaluation process, after the combinatorial evaluating method is expatiated and analyzed. Then IAF is put forward, and its characteristics are induced, after the characteristics of ISM, AHP,FE are presented. Finally, the risk evaluation index to engineering project is founded, and the concrete application of IAF is elaborated, taking the risk evaluation of two engineering projects as evaluated objects, and the comparable evaluation result is shown.