政法论坛：中国政法大学学报
政法論罈：中國政法大學學報
정법론단：중국정법대학학보
Tribune of Political Science and Law(Journal of China University of Political Science and Law)
2007年
4期
97~105
,共null页
大清刑律草案 签注 罚金刑
大清刑律草案 籤註 罰金刑
대청형률초안 첨주 벌금형
Draft Criminal Code of the Great Qing Dynasty;Written Opinions;Pecuniary Penalty
清末10年修律，首当其冲的就是刑事法律的改革。1907年10月，沈家本主持的修订法律馆上奏中国近代第一个刑法草案——大清刑律草案，在中国刑法史上第一次将罚金确定为五大主刑之一。从1908年到1910年，中央各部院堂官、地方各省督抚、将军都统陆续上奏对大清刑律草案的签注意见，其中涉及罚金的主要问题有：罚金定为主刑问题、罚金单位和等级问题、罚金易刑问题、罚金适用的过轻与过重问题、罚金与赔偿金的关系问题。回顾和分析罚金刑在中国近代刑法中的确立过程，将使我们在微观层次上对“会通中西”的法律变革原则有新的体悟，并有利于对近代“礼法之争”的再认识。
清末10年脩律，首噹其遲的就是刑事法律的改革。1907年10月，瀋傢本主持的脩訂法律館上奏中國近代第一箇刑法草案——大清刑律草案，在中國刑法史上第一次將罰金確定為五大主刑之一。從1908年到1910年，中央各部院堂官、地方各省督撫、將軍都統陸續上奏對大清刑律草案的籤註意見，其中涉及罰金的主要問題有：罰金定為主刑問題、罰金單位和等級問題、罰金易刑問題、罰金適用的過輕與過重問題、罰金與賠償金的關繫問題。迴顧和分析罰金刑在中國近代刑法中的確立過程，將使我們在微觀層次上對“會通中西”的法律變革原則有新的體悟，併有利于對近代“禮法之爭”的再認識。
청말10년수률，수당기충적취시형사법률적개혁。1907년10월，침가본주지적수정법률관상주중국근대제일개형법초안——대청형률초안，재중국형법사상제일차장벌금학정위오대주형지일。종1908년도1910년，중앙각부원당관、지방각성독무、장군도통륙속상주대대청형률초안적첨주의견，기중섭급벌금적주요문제유：벌금정위주형문제、벌금단위화등급문제、벌금역형문제、벌금괄용적과경여과중문제、벌금여배상금적관계문제。회고화분석벌금형재중국근대형법중적학립과정，장사아문재미관층차상대“회통중서”적법률변혁원칙유신적체오，병유리우대근대“례법지쟁”적재인식。
The Qing Dynasty amended its codes in its last 10 years, and the reform of criminal law was the first to be affected. In October 1907, the Law Revision Office presided by Shen Jiaben made an oral presentation to the emperor concerning the draft of the first modern criminal law in China - Draft Criminal Code of the Great Qing Dynasty, which for the first time established the pecuniary penalty of one of the five principal penalties in the history of Chinese criminal law. From 1908 to 1910, officials from each of the ministries of the central government, the governor - general and inspector - general of each of the provinces, and the commanders - in - chief presented their written opinions on the Draft Criminal Code of the Great Qing Dynasty in succession. The principal problems concerning pecuniary penalty were ： problem of establishing pecuniary penalty as a principal penalty, the problem of units and grades of the pecuniary penalty, the problem of bartering pecuniary penalty for remission of terms of imprisonment, the problem of too light or too heavy an imposition of the pecuniary penalty, and the problem of the relationship between the pecuniary penalty and damages. Retrospection and analysis of the course of the pecuniary penalty being established in modern criminal law is China will enable us to have a novel comprehension of the legal reform principle that is ＂commonly applied in China and the West＂ , and will be beneficial to have a new understanding of the modern ＂conflict of rites and law＂.
