心理科学
心理科學
심이과학
Psychological Science
2007年
5期
1169~1171
,共null页
韧性量表 心理测量学研究 信度 效度
韌性量錶 心理測量學研究 信度 效度
인성량표 심리측량학연구 신도 효도
Ego-Resiliency Scale, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, psychometric studies, reliability, validity
目的：考察自我韧性量表中文版的心理测量学指标，探讨其与Connor-Davidson韧性量表的关系，比较两者在中国人群中的应用效果。方法：在社区人群中施测自我韧性量表和Connor-Davidson韧性量表的中文版，以及自尊量表、生活满意度指数A问卷、大五人格问卷。结果：自我韧性量表中文版的内部一致性系数为0.77，略低于Connor-Davidson韧性量表。自我韧性量表与Connor-Davidson韧性量表的相关系数为0.61。在以自尊、生活满意度、大五人格为效标时，偏相关分析表明控制了Connor-Davidson韧性量表得分后，自我韧性量表与效标的相关未达到显著水平（除大五人格的外向性维度外）；但控制了自我韧性量表得分后，Connor-Davidson量表与效标的相关仍达到显著水平（除开放性维度外）。结论：在我国人群的应用中，Connor-Davidson韧性量表优于自我韧性量表，是值得推广的韧性测量工具。
目的：攷察自我韌性量錶中文版的心理測量學指標，探討其與Connor-Davidson韌性量錶的關繫，比較兩者在中國人群中的應用效果。方法：在社區人群中施測自我韌性量錶和Connor-Davidson韌性量錶的中文版，以及自尊量錶、生活滿意度指數A問捲、大五人格問捲。結果：自我韌性量錶中文版的內部一緻性繫數為0.77，略低于Connor-Davidson韌性量錶。自我韌性量錶與Connor-Davidson韌性量錶的相關繫數為0.61。在以自尊、生活滿意度、大五人格為效標時，偏相關分析錶明控製瞭Connor-Davidson韌性量錶得分後，自我韌性量錶與效標的相關未達到顯著水平（除大五人格的外嚮性維度外）；但控製瞭自我韌性量錶得分後，Connor-Davidson量錶與效標的相關仍達到顯著水平（除開放性維度外）。結論：在我國人群的應用中，Connor-Davidson韌性量錶優于自我韌性量錶，是值得推廣的韌性測量工具。
목적：고찰자아인성량표중문판적심리측량학지표，탐토기여Connor-Davidson인성량표적관계，비교량자재중국인군중적응용효과。방법：재사구인군중시측자아인성량표화Connor-Davidson인성량표적중문판，이급자존량표、생활만의도지수A문권、대오인격문권。결과：자아인성량표중문판적내부일치성계수위0.77，략저우Connor-Davidson인성량표。자아인성량표여Connor-Davidson인성량표적상관계수위0.61。재이자존、생활만의도、대오인격위효표시，편상관분석표명공제료Connor-Davidson인성량표득분후，자아인성량표여효표적상관미체도현저수평（제대오인격적외향성유도외）；단공제료자아인성량표득분후，Connor-Davidson량표여효표적상관잉체도현저수평（제개방성유도외）。결론：재아국인군적응용중，Connor-Davidson인성량표우우자아인성량표，시치득추엄적인성측량공구。
To investigate the psychometric characteristics of the Chinese version of Ego-Resiliency Scale, its relationship with Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, and their applications to Chinese people, the Ego-Resiliency Scale, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Self-Esteem Scale, Life Satisfaction Index A, and NEO-Five Factor Inventory were administered to community people. The results indicated that the internal consistent coefficient of Ego-Resiliency Scale was 0.77, which is lower than that of Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. The correlation coefficient between Ego- Resiliency Scale and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale was 0.61. When validated against self-esteem, life satisfaction, and the five-factor model of personality, Ego-Resiliency Scale was not significantly correlated with these validating indicators （except for the E of the five-factor model of personality） after the control over the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale in partial correlation. However, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale was still significantly correlated with the validating indicators （except for the O personality） after the control over Ego-Resiliency Scale. Our conclusion is that Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale is more effective than Ego-Resiliency Scale in application to Chinese people; Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale is a valuable instrument to measure resilience.
