CAJ | 학술논문

目前，学界关于环境权的内容界定还存在着分歧。一派认为，环境权的内容界定应呈现扩大之势，包括生态性权利和经济性权利，实体性权利和程序性权利等；另一派则认为，应当给环境权一个清晰的内容，其界定应呈现缩小趋势。两派的观点各自存在合理之处，完全否认任何一派的学说都是不明智的做法。
목전，학계관우배경권적내용계정환존재착분기。일파인위，배경권적내용계정응정현확대지세，포괄생태성권리화경제성권리，실체성권리화정서성권리등；령일파칙인위，응당급배경권일개청석적내용，기계정응정현축소추세。량파적관점각자존재합리지처，완전부인임하일파적학설도시불명지적주법。
There are two schools of law concerning the definition of the law of environment. While one school claims that it should encompass more rights in, say, other school argues that it should target at certain specifics ecology, economics, substances, and procedures, the Now that both are reasonable in certain aspects, the writer proposes a system of laws of environment.