CAJ | 학술논문

学术界在马克思恩格斯思想关系研究中存在着许多谬见：在《神圣家族》中马克思对费尔巴哈的评价不高而恩格斯则过高；恩格斯在《反杜林论》中关于自然辩证法的研究成果没有得到马克思的认同，马克思并不支持自然辩证法的立场；恩格斯在整理出版《资本论》时存在着对马克思原稿的实质性的改变；马克思因为长期在经济上依赖恩格斯而有可能使马克思在理论上做出某种自觉或不自觉的妥协和让步，两人的合作不排除彼此误解的可能性；恩格斯思想与马克思思想之间有基本预设上的距离即所谓思想上的异质性而非基于共同的预设而形成的次要的、非实质性的差别；等等。这些谬见不仅在理论上制造了许多混乱，而且在某种程度上既贬损了恩格斯也贬抑了马克思，有必要予以澄清。
학술계재마극사은격사사상관계연구중존재착허다류견：재《신골가족》중마극사대비이파합적평개불고이은격사칙과고；은격사재《반두림론》중관우자연변증법적연구성과몰유득도마극사적인동，마극사병불지지자연변증법적립장；은격사재정리출판《자본론》시존재착대마극사원고적실질성적개변；마극사인위장기재경제상의뢰은격사이유가능사마극사재이론상주출모충자각혹불자각적타협화양보，량인적합작불배제피차오해적가능성；은격사사상여마극사사상지간유기본예설상적거리즉소위사상상적이질성이비기우공동적예설이형성적차요적、비실질성적차별；등등。저사류견불부재이론상제조료허다혼란，이차재모충정도상기폄손료은격사야폄억료마극사，유필요여이징청。
In academic circles, there are too many fallacies in the research of ideological relations between Marx and Engels, such as Marx highly appraised Feuerbach but Engels didn＇t in the holy family; Marx didn＇t approve Engels＇ research result of Dialectics of Nature in Anti - Duhring and he didn＇t support the stand of it; Engels changed Marx＇s Original manuscript Substantively when he sort out and put out on capital; because Marx depended on Engels in economic, it is possible that Marx reached some compromise and made some concessions consciously or not, as a result, the coop- eration between them might exist some misunderstanding; Marx＇ ideology differed from Engels＇ on the basic default, in other words, that is the different nature but not the secondary or substantial difference; and so on. These fallacies not only made some confusion, but also belittled both Marx and Engels to a certain extent, so we have to clarify these fallacies.