重庆大学学报：社会科学版
重慶大學學報：社會科學版
중경대학학보：사회과학판
Journal of Chongqing University(Social Sciences Edition)
2007年
6期
116~120
,共null页
经典测量理论 信度 信度理论 信度系数
經典測量理論 信度 信度理論 信度繫數
경전측량이론 신도 신도이론 신도계수
classical test theory; reliability; reliability theory; reliability coefficient
文章指出了《教育测量学》一书关于信度理论和信度系数值得商榷之处：系数的定义表述不严谨，未区分信度系数的定义式和估计式，对信度系数定义的评注不符合科学现状，定理的证明含有错误，证明的条件不全，符号使用混乱；建议在入门教材中删除有关信度系数的证明过程。
文章指齣瞭《教育測量學》一書關于信度理論和信度繫數值得商榷之處：繫數的定義錶述不嚴謹，未區分信度繫數的定義式和估計式，對信度繫數定義的評註不符閤科學現狀，定理的證明含有錯誤，證明的條件不全，符號使用混亂；建議在入門教材中刪除有關信度繫數的證明過程。
문장지출료《교육측량학》일서관우신도이론화신도계수치득상각지처：계수적정의표술불엄근，미구분신도계수적정의식화고계식，대신도계수정의적평주불부합과학현상，정리적증명함유착오，증명적조건불전，부호사용혼란；건의재입문교재중산제유관신도계수적증명과정。
This paper elaborates on the doubtful points with regard to reliability theory and reliability coefficient in the textbook Educational Measurement. These points include loose definition of reliability, unjust remarks on the definition, erroneous proof of theorems and inadequacy of necessary conditions for the proof, inconsistency in notation and the use of symbols. It suggests that in textbooks at the introductory level, mathematical proofs of theorems concerning the estimation of reliability coefficient be cut out.
