河北法学
河北法學
하북법학
Hebei Law Science
2008年
2期
109~113
,共null页
侦查主体 侦查主体 元化 检警 体化 警察 体化模式 纪委
偵查主體 偵查主體 元化 檢警 體化 警察 體化模式 紀委
정사주체 정사주체 원화 검경 체화 경찰 체화모식 기위
subject of investigation;subject of investigation centralization;roseeutor and police integration;model of prosecutor andpolice integration;commission for disciplinary inspection
我国现行侦查主体设置与侦查权配置的二元化模式不符合国际“侦查主体-元化”的潮流,因此后者必然成为我国在此方面改革的借鉴。“检警-体化”的侦查模式由于其存在特定缺陷也难以与我国历史情况与现实国情契合,因此按“警察-体化”的侦查模式重新调整我国现有的检警关系成为我国对此改革的方向。独立、垂直的职务犯罪侦查局的设置可以将剥离出来的检察机关对职务犯罪的侦查权和纪委对党员干部涉嫌职务犯罪的调查权或称之为“准侦查权”合并吸纳,有利于对职务犯罪的实际预防、控制和惩处。
我國現行偵查主體設置與偵查權配置的二元化模式不符閤國際“偵查主體-元化”的潮流,因此後者必然成為我國在此方麵改革的藉鑒。“檢警-體化”的偵查模式由于其存在特定缺陷也難以與我國歷史情況與現實國情契閤,因此按“警察-體化”的偵查模式重新調整我國現有的檢警關繫成為我國對此改革的方嚮。獨立、垂直的職務犯罪偵查跼的設置可以將剝離齣來的檢察機關對職務犯罪的偵查權和紀委對黨員榦部涉嫌職務犯罪的調查權或稱之為“準偵查權”閤併吸納,有利于對職務犯罪的實際預防、控製和懲處。
아국현행정사주체설치여정사권배치적이원화모식불부합국제“정사주체-원화”적조류,인차후자필연성위아국재차방면개혁적차감。“검경-체화”적정사모식유우기존재특정결함야난이여아국역사정황여현실국정계합,인차안“경찰-체화”적정사모식중신조정아국현유적검경관계성위아국대차개혁적방향。독립、수직적직무범죄정사국적설치가이장박리출래적검찰궤관대직무범죄적정사권화기위대당원간부섭혐직무범죄적조사권혹칭지위“준정사권”합병흡납,유리우대직무범죄적실제예방、공제화징처。
Rational setting up the subject of investigation implies high efficiency and fairly performing the power of investigation. This article objectively analyses the specific practice concerning the subject of investigation in today world's major countries. Then link our country's actual situation, we reasonable analyses two methods in reforming of “monism on the subject of investigation”. Indicating the dominant ideology who advocated prosecutor is single subject of investigation has a certain positive meaning. However, in compared with the first way, the second way, police is single subject of investigation, canceling the prosecutor's power to investigate is more available. At last, we think that commission for disciplinary inspection who is the subject of investigation beyond law have the cause of existence, but should be reformed, made it legitimate.