CAJ | 학술논문

本文的研究聚集于孙绍振的新著《文学性讲演录》，着重分析其对情感逻辑、文学形式规范等问题的研究，并将之与苏珊·朗格的形式主义美学进行了细致深入的比较。虽然苏珊·朗格对艺术形式的研究达到了相当的高度与力度，但也因其形而上特质而流于空疏，而孙绍振恰恰在她无法深入之处，以其罕见的经验归纳与理论抽象能力，将原本形而上的概念与规律予以深化、细化、具体化与可操作化。而这种分区，所体现的乃是二者各自基于不同的学术传统所做的继承与超越，以及出于不同的理论目的与兴趣所进行的理论建构。
본문적연구취집우손소진적신저《문학성강연록》，착중분석기대정감라집、문학형식규범등문제적연구，병장지여소산·랑격적형식주의미학진행료세치심입적비교。수연소산·랑격대예술형식적연구체도료상당적고도여력도，단야인기형이상특질이류우공소，이손소진흡흡재저무법심입지처，이기한견적경험귀납여이론추상능력，장원본형이상적개념여규률여이심화、세화、구체화여가조작화。이저충분구，소체현적내시이자각자기우불동적학술전통소주적계승여초월，이급출우불동적이론목적여흥취소진행적이론건구。
This paper focuses on Sun Shaozhen＇s new works A Lecture on Literariness, deeply analyzes Sun＇s study on the logic of feeling and the literary formal principles, and compares it with Susan Langer＇s formalist aesthetics in detail. As a conclusion, we consider that Langer＇s study on art forms achieves a considerable height and strength, but it is a little empty because of its metaphysical character, while Sun deepens, particularizes, reifys and operationalizes the metaphysical concepts and principles which Langer cannot discuss deeply with his unusual abilities of induction and abstraction. The difference between Sun and Langer shows they both inherit and exceed each academic tradition, and construct their own theory proceeding from each theoretical aim and interest.