现代法学
現代法學
현대법학
Modern Law Science
2008年
1期
74~80
,共null页
连带债务 类似必要共同诉讼 普通共同诉讼
連帶債務 類似必要共同訴訟 普通共同訴訟
련대채무 유사필요공동소송 보통공동소송
joint and several liabilities; analogous necessary joinder of parties; permissive joinder
我国现行《民事诉讼法》将连带债务共同诉讼作为必要共同诉讼的情形之一，要求连带债务人必须共同进行诉讼。学术界和实务界一致认为，应将必要共同诉讼划分为固有必要共同诉讼与类似必要共同诉讼，并将连带债务共同诉讼理所当然地归入类似必要共同诉讼的范畴。从民事实体法与民事程序法的联结点上来考察，连带债务共同诉讼应属普通共同诉讼，而非类似必要共同诉讼。
我國現行《民事訴訟法》將連帶債務共同訴訟作為必要共同訴訟的情形之一，要求連帶債務人必鬚共同進行訴訟。學術界和實務界一緻認為，應將必要共同訴訟劃分為固有必要共同訴訟與類似必要共同訴訟，併將連帶債務共同訴訟理所噹然地歸入類似必要共同訴訟的範疇。從民事實體法與民事程序法的聯結點上來攷察，連帶債務共同訴訟應屬普通共同訴訟，而非類似必要共同訴訟。
아국현행《민사소송법》장련대채무공동소송작위필요공동소송적정형지일，요구련대채무인필수공동진행소송。학술계화실무계일치인위，응장필요공동소송화분위고유필요공동소송여유사필요공동소송，병장련대채무공동소송리소당연지귀입유사필요공동소송적범주。종민사실체법여민사정서법적련결점상래고찰，련대채무공동소송응속보통공동소송，이비유사필요공동소송。
It is unclear why in China＇ s present civil procedure law there is a compulsory requirement that parties with joint and several liabilities or claims thereof be united in a single lawsuit. A consensus has been reached by scholars and legal profession that the compulsory joinder should be categorized as inherent necessary joinder and analogous necessary joinder, and joinder of a party with joint and several liabilities beyond doubt should fall within the ambit of the latter one. In perspective of both civil substantive law and procedural law, joinder of parties with joint and several liabilities belongs to permissive joinder rather than non-analogous necessary joinder.
