财经研究
財經研究
재경연구
The Study of Finance and Economics
2008年
3期
107~120
,共null页
经济组织 权力比例结构 制序度
經濟組織 權力比例結構 製序度
경제조직 권력비례결구 제서도
economic organization; power-ratio structure; degree of system order
由分工产生的交易成本及团队效应,是经济组织的两种诱发起源方式,前者本质是权力,并由股权权威人为制造“制序”,后者本质是制度,并由分散的股权意志加总,演化形成系统内部制序,两者均是实现组织制序快速同化、降低交易成本的决定因素,其经济组织的生产函数由该权力比例结构下形成的制度所决定。当组织中不同利益参与者的平均福利量会增加、但不是所有人的边际量会相等时,其诱致性制度变迁的选择性激励偏好,将产生外部性并出现市场失灵;而强制性制度变迁,则是一组权力序的相互博弈妥协的结果,所达成的制度内容是制序的“度”的选择,称为“制序度”,其效率具有先降后升再下降的特征,其利益参与者的不同行为选择,将由他们持有的不同稀缺资源在权力结构中的利益分配值即夏普利值所决定。
由分工產生的交易成本及糰隊效應,是經濟組織的兩種誘髮起源方式,前者本質是權力,併由股權權威人為製造“製序”,後者本質是製度,併由分散的股權意誌加總,縯化形成繫統內部製序,兩者均是實現組織製序快速同化、降低交易成本的決定因素,其經濟組織的生產函數由該權力比例結構下形成的製度所決定。噹組織中不同利益參與者的平均福利量會增加、但不是所有人的邊際量會相等時,其誘緻性製度變遷的選擇性激勵偏好,將產生外部性併齣現市場失靈;而彊製性製度變遷,則是一組權力序的相互博弈妥協的結果,所達成的製度內容是製序的“度”的選擇,稱為“製序度”,其效率具有先降後升再下降的特徵,其利益參與者的不同行為選擇,將由他們持有的不同稀缺資源在權力結構中的利益分配值即夏普利值所決定。
유분공산생적교역성본급단대효응,시경제조직적량충유발기원방식,전자본질시권력,병유고권권위인위제조“제서”,후자본질시제도,병유분산적고권의지가총,연화형성계통내부제서,량자균시실현조직제서쾌속동화、강저교역성본적결정인소,기경제조직적생산함수유해권력비례결구하형성적제도소결정。당조직중불동이익삼여자적평균복리량회증가、단불시소유인적변제량회상등시,기유치성제도변천적선택성격려편호,장산생외부성병출현시장실령;이강제성제도변천,칙시일조권력서적상호박혁타협적결과,소체성적제도내용시제서적“도”적선택,칭위“제서도”,기효솔구유선강후승재하강적특정,기이익삼여자적불동행위선택,장유타문지유적불동희결자원재권력결구중적이익분배치즉하보리치소결정。
Trading costs and team-work effect, the result of social divi- sion of labor, are two factors that trigger economic organizations. For the former, the nature of which is power, an order made by the authoritative share-holder; for the latter,the nature of which is institution,an internal order evolving from the add up of the will of the scattering share-holders. Both of them are the deciding factors in effecting a quick assimilation of institutional order and decreasing trading costs. The productive function of these e- conomic organizations is determined by systems based on the power-ratio structure. When the average welfare of the members in the organization increases with margin differences, we should rethink the logic feasibility of an including system change. A compulsory change of system is a consequence of the mutual gaming and mutual compromising of the power clusters. Its outcome,a selection of the “degree of order” of the system, is referred as “degree of system order”, whose efficiency clearly bears characteristics of hysteretic nature. Under the compulsorily changed system, the behavior of the participants is decided by the rare resources they hold and the value of their interests shared,i, e. the Shapley value.