武汉体育学院学报
武漢體育學院學報
무한체육학원학보
Journal of Wuhan Institute of Physical Education
2008年
4期
54~57
,共null页
框架效应 人格特征 运动决策 高水平运动员 普通高校 运动心理学
框架效應 人格特徵 運動決策 高水平運動員 普通高校 運動心理學
광가효응 인격특정 운동결책 고수평운동원 보통고교 운동심이학
framing effect ; personality trait ; decision-making ; excellent athlete ; institutes ＆ universities; sports psychology
探讨正负信息呈现方式对高校高水平学生运动员的运动决策行为及人格特征的影响作用。研究方法：采用自编运动员决策问题问卷和大五人格量表（中国修订版），以分层抽样的方法，抽取高水平运动员260人为研究对象，随机分为两组，正面框架组（n=126），负面框架组（n=123），对两组问被试的方案选择进行X^2检验，方案选择与人格特征的关系进行t检验。结果：接受正面框架实验情景的被试，保守和冒险方案选择人数比例相当，分别为42．86％和57．14％；负面框架组的被试，只有17．07％选择保守方案，差异有统计学意义。正面框架下，外向性维度得分高的被试个体倾向于冒险，愉悦性维度得分高的被试个体倾向于保守；但在负面框架中，差异无统计学意义。负面框架下被试个体更倾向于冒险；外向性和愉悦人格特征与运动决策行为有关。
探討正負信息呈現方式對高校高水平學生運動員的運動決策行為及人格特徵的影響作用。研究方法：採用自編運動員決策問題問捲和大五人格量錶（中國脩訂版），以分層抽樣的方法，抽取高水平運動員260人為研究對象，隨機分為兩組，正麵框架組（n=126），負麵框架組（n=123），對兩組問被試的方案選擇進行X^2檢驗，方案選擇與人格特徵的關繫進行t檢驗。結果：接受正麵框架實驗情景的被試，保守和冒險方案選擇人數比例相噹，分彆為42．86％和57．14％；負麵框架組的被試，隻有17．07％選擇保守方案，差異有統計學意義。正麵框架下，外嚮性維度得分高的被試箇體傾嚮于冒險，愉悅性維度得分高的被試箇體傾嚮于保守；但在負麵框架中，差異無統計學意義。負麵框架下被試箇體更傾嚮于冒險；外嚮性和愉悅人格特徵與運動決策行為有關。
탐토정부신식정현방식대고교고수평학생운동원적운동결책행위급인격특정적영향작용。연구방법：채용자편운동원결책문제문권화대오인격량표（중국수정판），이분층추양적방법，추취고수평운동원260인위연구대상，수궤분위량조，정면광가조（n=126），부면광가조（n=123），대량조문피시적방안선택진행X^2검험，방안선택여인격특정적관계진행t검험。결과：접수정면광가실험정경적피시，보수화모험방안선택인수비례상당，분별위42．86％화57．14％；부면광가조적피시，지유17．07％선택보수방안，차이유통계학의의。정면광가하，외향성유도득분고적피시개체경향우모험，유열성유도득분고적피시개체경향우보수；단재부면광가중，차이무통계학의의。부면광가하피시개체경경향우모험；외향성화유열인격특정여운동결책행위유관。
Influence of positive and negative information on excellent university athletes＇ decision-making behavior and their personality traits were discussed. METHODS：By cluster sampling, 260 excellent athletes from universities were investigated with the adoption of Modified Big Five Personality Scale and self-de- signed decision making scale. The athletes were randomly divided into 2 groups, the first group（ n = 126） were in a positive framing and the second group（ n = 123） in a negative framing. An X^2 test was used to analyze the results of program chosen and t test was used to determine the relationship between personality dimension and risky choice. RESULTS：Of those in the positive framing, 42.86 % chose the safe program and 57.14% chose the risky program. Only 17.07% in the negative framing chose the safe program. In positive framing,subjects with high scores of Extraversion were likely to take the risky option, while those with high scores of Agreeable were likely to take the safe option. In negative framing, results indicated that options appeared to be independent of the personality traits. CONCLUSION： People in negative framing were more apt to risky program. Personality traits of Extroversion and Agreeable were related to decision making behavior and were predictors of risk taking.
