CAJ | 학술논문

对学生学业成绩的评价，传统习惯方法是以算术平均数为标准进行评价，还有人用平均学分绩点和学分权平均原始成绩为标准。本文提出基于学分制的学生学业成绩评价模型——学分权平均标准成绩和因子分析法，并通过实例分析比较了这两种方法比学分权平均原始成绩方法的科学性、合理性。
대학생학업성적적평개，전통습관방법시이산술평균수위표준진행평개，환유인용평균학분적점화학분권평균원시성적위표준。본문제출기우학분제적학생학업성적평개모형——학분권평균표준성적화인자분석법，병통과실례분석비교료저량충방법비학분권평균원시성적방법적과학성、합이성。
According to traditional method, students＇ academic achievement is evaluated by arithmetic average, or by average credit and average of primitive score by credit weight. Adopting two new methods of average of criterion score by credit weight and factor analysis, the paper advances an evaluation model of students＇ academic achievement based on the credit system. The two new methods are further analyzed and compared with the traditional method of average of primitive score by credit weight. The results indicate that the new methods are more scientific and rational than the traditional one.