CAJ | 학술논문

从科尔曼为代表的理性选择理论出发会发现,作为“理性人”,国际NGO扶贫行为的理性选择与我国的贫困缓解息息相关。国际NGO的扶贫行为,一方面出于组织自身的独立性、自主性表现出明显的个体理性选择因素,另一方面又因其海外性、嵌入性而不能不作出社会理性选择。国际NGO的社会理性选择直接影响了这些组织在我国的扶贫方向与内容,而其个体理性选择又直接决定了这些组织在我国独特的扶贫路径与方法。为了实现缓解贫困的“效益最大化”,国际NGO必须兼顾个体理性与社会理性,在二者之间作出灵活的理性选择,即吉登斯的主体-结构二重性。
종과이만위대표적이성선택이론출발회발현,작위“이성인”,국제NGO부빈행위적이성선택여아국적빈곤완해식식상관。국제NGO적부빈행위,일방면출우조직자신적독립성、자주성표현출명현적개체이성선택인소,령일방면우인기해외성、감입성이불능불작출사회이성선택。국제NGO적사회이성선택직접영향료저사조직재아국적부빈방향여내용,이기개체이성선택우직접결정료저사조직재아국독특적부빈로경여방법。위료실현완해빈곤적“효익최대화”,국제NGO필수겸고개체이성여사회이성,재이자지간작출령활적이성선택,즉길등사적주체-결구이중성。
Eyes on the rational choice theory of Colman, as the rational person, International NGOs＇ behavior of helping the poor is linked closely with the status of china＇s poverty alleviation. On the one hand, these behaviors display the obvious individual rationality choice factor proceeding from their own organized independence. On the other hand, these international NGOs have no alternative but to make the social rationality choice for their own overseas and embed speciality. While, during these international NGOs develop their activity on poverty alleviation in China, its social rationality choice has directly affection on the direction and the content, but its individual rationality choice has directly decided the ways and the methods. So, in order to realize the maximization benefit of poverty alleviation, international NGOs should give dual attention to the individual rationality and the social rationality, and should make the nimble rational choice between these two choices, that is, Giddens＇s duality of structure.