CAJ | 학술논문

从博弈论的视角看，大陆法系国家刑事诉讼程序中所适用的传统起诉模式容易导致囚徒困境。在囚徒困境中，控辩双方所形成的纳什均衡并不是双方受益最大的选择，不能形成帕累托最优。美国的辩诉交易制度，由于控辩双方的信息比较对称，各自的交流又不存在很大的阻隔，且双方都是多次博弈，容易形成帕累托最优。将被害人纳入辩诉交易的主体范围，可以对被害人的利益进行更好的保护。
종박혁론적시각간，대륙법계국가형사소송정서중소괄용적전통기소모식용역도치수도곤경。재수도곤경중，공변쌍방소형성적납십균형병불시쌍방수익최대적선택，불능형성파루탁최우。미국적변소교역제도，유우공변쌍방적신식비교대칭，각자적교류우불존재흔대적조격，차쌍방도시다차박혁，용역형성파루탁최우。장피해인납입변소교역적주체범위，가이대피해인적이익진행경호적보호。
Looking from the Game theory, criminal prosecution procedure of the country which is suitable and traditional in the mainland legal system. Which is easy to cause the difficult of conviction position. Controls in the convict difficult position debates Nash who both sides form balanced is not the both sides maximum gain choice, cannot form Pareto optimum. US plea bargaining system, because controls debates the bilateral informa- tion quite to be symmetrical, respective exchange does not have very big impediment, also both sides are gamble many times, easy to form the Pareto optimum. The victims will join in the body and be pretected well.