河南大学学报：社会科学版
河南大學學報：社會科學版
하남대학학보：사회과학판
Journal of Henan University(Social Science）
2008年
4期
63~69
,共null页
清儒 周代 天子宗庙 祖先祭祀 礼制
清儒 週代 天子宗廟 祖先祭祀 禮製
청유 주대 천자종묘 조선제사 례제
the Confucian Scholars of the Qing Dynasty; the Zhou Dynasty; the emperors＇ ancestral temple; sacrifice for the ancestors; the ritual system
关于儒家经典记载的周代天子宗庙四时祭,清儒既有遵循郑玄学说者,以《周礼》、《诗经》、《公羊传》、《尔雅》记载的四时祭名为周代礼制,《礼记》之《王制》、《郊特牲》、《祭义》、《祭统》记载的四时祭名为夏、商礼制,也有对郑玄学说提出异议者,认为上述文献记载的皆为周代礼制。就“禘”、“祫”祭祖礼制而言,清儒或遵循郑玄等汉儒之说,或遵循赵匡、王安石等唐、宋儒者之说,或折中诸说,或另倡新说,对“禘”、“祫”祭礼名实异同,“禘”祭礼的含义,“禘”、“祫”祭礼类型,“禘”、“祫”祭礼举行的时间间隔等问题进行诠释。以“汉学”、“宋学”对清儒经学诠释进行畛域分明的划分,则有失简单。
關于儒傢經典記載的週代天子宗廟四時祭,清儒既有遵循鄭玄學說者,以《週禮》、《詩經》、《公羊傳》、《爾雅》記載的四時祭名為週代禮製,《禮記》之《王製》、《郊特牲》、《祭義》、《祭統》記載的四時祭名為夏、商禮製,也有對鄭玄學說提齣異議者,認為上述文獻記載的皆為週代禮製。就“禘”、“祫”祭祖禮製而言,清儒或遵循鄭玄等漢儒之說,或遵循趙劻、王安石等唐、宋儒者之說,或摺中諸說,或另倡新說,對“禘”、“祫”祭禮名實異同,“禘”祭禮的含義,“禘”、“祫”祭禮類型,“禘”、“祫”祭禮舉行的時間間隔等問題進行詮釋。以“漢學”、“宋學”對清儒經學詮釋進行畛域分明的劃分,則有失簡單。
관우유가경전기재적주대천자종묘사시제,청유기유준순정현학설자,이《주례》、《시경》、《공양전》、《이아》기재적사시제명위주대례제,《례기》지《왕제》、《교특생》、《제의》、《제통》기재적사시제명위하、상례제,야유대정현학설제출이의자,인위상술문헌기재적개위주대례제。취“체”、“협”제조례제이언,청유혹준순정현등한유지설,혹준순조광、왕안석등당、송유자지설,혹절중제설,혹령창신설,대“체”、“협”제례명실이동,“체”제례적함의,“체”、“협”제례류형,“체”、“협”제례거행적시간간격등문제진행전석。이“한학”、“송학”대청유경학전석진행진역분명적화분,칙유실간단。
As far as the ＂sishiji＂（ 四时祭 ）recorded by the Confucian canons were concerned, the Confucian Scholars of the Qing Dynasty either followed ZhengXuan＇ s teaching that ZhouLi, ShiJing, GongYangzhuan and ErYa recorded the Zhou Dynasty＇ s ritual system, WangZhi, JiaoTeSheng, JiYi and JiTong that included in LiJi recorded the Xia or Shang Dynasty＇ s ritual system. or questioned ZhengXuan＇s teachings that the ＂sishiji＂ recorded by the canons above-mentioned were the Zhou Dynasty＇s ritual system . As far as the Di（褅） and Xia（袷） sacrifice ritual system were concerned, The Confucian Scholars of the Qing Dynasty either followed ZhengXuan＇s teaching, or followed ZhaoKuang, WangAnshi＇s teaching, or compromised teachings put forward formerly, or initiated new teachings, explained such questiones as the similarities and differences, the types and the intervals of the Di（褅） and Xia（袷） , the meaning of the Di（褅）. It is simple to make a clear distinction between the Han and the Song school of classical philology on the Confucian canons explained by the Confucian Scholars of the Qing Dynasty.
